Rorate Caeli

FIUV Papers published as Lulu book

Support independent publishing: Buy this book on Lulu.I am delighted to announce that the Introduction and first 13 FIUV Position Papers, all of which have been published here in the course of 2012, can now be purchased hard copy from Lulu, the print-on-demand publisher.

Just to remind everyone, these papers address specific aspects of the 1962 Missal, in order to articulate the value of these points of the ancient liturgical tradition. The purpose is to inform the debate about the ancient liturgy in general, and about the 'Reform of the Reform', and particularly the debate about possible revisions to the 1962 Missal. The papers seek to defend the tradition with reference to magisterial documents wherever possible, and while the papers are short (less than 16oo words) they are quite heavily footnoted, with a lot of quotations in Latin and English to back up the argument. We have covered issues such as altar girls, communion on the hand, celebration ad orientem, the use of Latin and silence, and the use of the Vulgate (as opposed to the Neo-Vulgate); they discuss the issue of adding Prefaces to the 1962 Missal, and how the Extraordinary Form can contribute to the 'new evangelisation', and a number of other topics. You can view the full set here as downloadable pdfs, but if you want to give them to an open-minded priest or friend (for Christmas, perhaps?) then you can buy this inexpensive, attractive and slim volume (125 pages).

His Excellency Archbishop Thomas Gullickson, Apostolic Nuncio to the Ukraine, who has often commented on this blog and has written guest posts here (here and here), reviewed three of these as they came out, on his own blog, Deo Volente: The Manner of Receiving Holy Communion, the Vulgate and the Ancient Latin Psalters, and the EF and Western Culture. He has very kindly agreed to endorse the book as a whole, and I paste this in below.


From Archbishop Thomas Gullickson.

I think I would have enjoyed writing additional reviews [on the blog] and could have weighed in much more heavily on behalf of a project which has enjoyed my favour since I first became acquainted with it, namely The FIUV Papers on the Liturgy, which discuss specific issues concerning the 1962 Missal. The Papers have become one of the pillars of the internet presence of the Foederatio Internationalis Una Voce.

The genius of the 13 papers, to my mind, is that they do indeed teach and quite comprehensively, offering important lessons about why we need to focus more or better on the very real issue of what to do about the rupture in the continuity of our liturgical tradition which has come to be and not through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. As important as it may be to get about the business of repairing, I find the work done by these papers to be of a prior importance to any decision about "reforming the reform" or "rebooting" after choosing a restoration point and establishing principles for the organic development of a restored Roman Rite. The FIUV Papers on the Liturgy really grapple with what the Holy Father calls the mutual enrichment of the two forms of the Roman Rite.

Support independent publishing: Buy this book on Lulu.Without wanting to be a reductionist about assessing their worth, let me say simply that reading and ruminating over the FIUV Papers on the Liturgy could serve as a marvellous primer for anyone, clergy or laity, on how to address what often ends up being controversial, doing so in a very different and respectful manner.


  1. thank you - have bookmarked the link for these 'position peices'.

    re: The Instruction Universae Ecclesiae makes it clear that Holy Communion is to be received kneeling and on the tongue at celebrations of the Extraordinary Form. Reception on the tongue is, in fact, the universal law of the Church, from which particular Episcopal Conferences have received derogations. The value of kneeling to show one’s humility in the presence of the sacred is affirmed in innumerable texts of Scripture and emphasised by Pope Benedict XVI in his book ‘The Spirit of the Liturgy’. The moment of receiving Holy Communion is the most appropriate of all to show this attitude. Reception on the tongue, while not universal in the Early Church, became so quickly, and this reflected the great concern shown by the Fathers that particles of the host not be lost, a concern reiterated in Pope Paul VI’s Memoriale Domini. In conclusion, the traditional manner of receiving Holy Communion, which evinces both humility and childlike receptivity...

    how does one descern whether a priest is 'open-minded' to be concerned 'that particles of the host not be lost? especially if 'in the mitts', and out of unconsecrated hands is common for reception?

    Catholic has been usurped and redefined meaning: 'according the hyper-imdividualism of parish, fed by gregarian diocesan, practice'.

  2. Is there a freely available PDF equivalent to the LuLu book? Thanks

  3. No - you can download the individual papers or buy the book!

  4. Just purchased it. Can't wait to get it! Have you considered amazon createspace or kindle?

    Thanks for putting this together!


Comment boxes are debate forums for readers and contributors of RORATE CÆLI.

Please, DO NOT assume that RORATE CÆLI contributors or moderators necessarily agree with or otherwise endorse any particular comment just because they let it stand.


(1) This is our living room, in a deeply Catholic house, and you are our guest. Please, behave accordingly. Any comment may be blocked or deleted, at any time, whenever we perceive anything that is not up to our standards, not conducive to a healthy conversation or a healthy Catholic environment, or simply not to our liking.

(2) By clicking on the "publish your comment" button, please remain aware that you are choosing to make your comment public - that is, the comment box is not to be used for private and confidential correspondence with contributors and moderators.

(3) Any name/ pseudonym/ denomination may be freely used simply by choosing the third option, "Name/URL" (the URL box may be left empty), when posting your comment - therefore, there is no reason whatsoever to simply post as "Anonymous", making debate unnecessarily harder to follow. Any comment signed simply as "Anonymous" will be blocked.

Thank you!