"The old rite is the Church’s greatest treasure, her emergency kit, her Noah’s ark"
"In the center is the Eucharistic Jesus Christ, the tabernacle, the cross. That is where we must begin. Otherwise we lose the sense of the Divine."
The following translations of other interviews with Msgr. Bux can be found on Rorate:
Interview with Monsignor Nicola Bux
It is well known that the liturgy pertains to the dogma of the Church. Everybody knows that the faith of the Church is close to the liturgy and that from prayer one returns to dogma. Everybody knows the saying, “lex orandi lex credendi.” And it is from the way we pray that we understand what we believe, but it is also from the way we believe that we derive the way to pray. This had been taken up and wisely developed in the encyclical Mediator Dei of the Venerable Servant of God Pius XII.
· For a while now even the most tenacious supporters of a “permanent revolution” in the liturgy seem to give in before the wise argumentation of the Pope, of which there’s a clear echo in your book. Are we witnessing a new (or old if you prefer) vision of the liturgy?
Liturgy is, by its nature, of divine institution, based on the unchangeable will of its divine Founder. Because this is in fact the basis of the liturgy, we may affirm that the liturgy is “of divine right.” It is not by chance that the Orientals use the term “Divine Liturgy,” because this is God’s work, the “opus Dei”, as Saint Benedict says. The liturgy is not of a thing of human origin. In the conciliar document on the liturgy, in no. 22, § 3, it is clearly stated that no one, not even a priest, may add, take away, or change anything. Why? The liturgy belongs to the Lord. During Lent, we read the passages from Deuteronomy where God Himself establishes the practical details of worship. In the New Testament, it is Jesus Himself Who tells the disciples how they should prepare the supper. God has the right to be adored as He wishes and not as we wish. Otherwise we fall into a cult of “idolatry” in the proper meaning of the Greek term, i.e. worship made in our own image. When the liturgy mirrors the tastes or creative tendencies of the priest or of a group of the laity it becomes “idolatry.” Catholic worship is worship in spirit and in truth; it is a turning towards the Father, in the Holy Spirit, but it has to pass through Jesus Christ, has to pass through the Truth. Therefore, it is necessary to rediscover that God has the right to be adored as He Himself has established. The ritual forms aren’t a matter “to be interpreted,” because these forms come out of the discerned faith, which becomes, in a certain sense, the culture of the Church. The Church has always been anxious that the rites not be the product of subjective tastes but the exact expression of the entire Church, which is “catholic.” The liturgy is catholic, universal. Therefore, even when we are dealing with a particular celebration held in a particular place, it is not possible to celebrate it in contrast to the “catholic” physiognomy of liturgy.
· Unfortunately, we find ourselves confronted with an attitude of the clergy by which—even if they do not openly deny the efficacy of the Sacraments—they too often leave aside the so-called “ex opere operato” aspect of the Sacrament, so that it is almost reduced to being a mere “symbol.” Is the cause perhaps to be found in the loss of a traditional “rituality”?
The reason for this is that one has forgotten that worship is not given to an imaginary God, but to a God Who is present, a God Who acts, that is to the Lord Jesus. Sacrosanctum Concilium n. 7 even explains to us the modes of this presence. Such an article is almost charged with the weight of Mediator Dei , to which it adds the presence in the Word. It is clearly explained here that the liturgy has its raison d’être in the presence of God; otherwise it becomes self-referential, it becomes empty.
Forgetting, under-valuing the Lord’s presence, which is at its fullest in the Eucharist, where He is truly, really, and substantially present, is the reason for the drifting away you mention. With such a deformation, one ends up defining the liturgy [erroneously] as a conjunction of symbols and signs, as one can sometimes hear people say; in this framework, “sign” is understood only as “something which refers to something else.” The idea that the sign is at one with what it signifies is not present. That, though, is where [the notion of] the Sacrament arises. When this aspect is lost, the Sacraments are reduced to mere symbols. One loses the sense of their “efficacy,” of the effects that they cause. There is no longer an understanding of the Lord Who “acts,” Who “works” through the Sacraments. This is the meaning of the classical expression “ex opere operato,” which is a bit strange, but which means that the efficacy of the Sacrament derives from Him who operates in it. I will take the example of a drug [medicine]. In appearance you see a bottle or a pill or a liquid, but it is not only the symbol of the remedy which the doctor wants to bring about, because we assume that if we take them they will cure us and heal us; that is, the effects take hold. The author of this effect is the Lord, Who is present and operating in the sacramental rite. St. Leo the Great, who is cited in The Catechism of the Catholic Church, says that after the Ascension, all that was visible of the Lord here on earth passed into the Sacraments. It is in this way that the Lord continues to be present and visible to us in our own days. It is necessary that we look at things in this light if we wish to understand Saint Thomas [Aquinas] when he speaks of the “matter” of the Sacraments. If we do not return to this kind of realistic expression, we will not be able to understand the Sacraments. The divine presence is not only something that we look at as something “symbolic” but as something which touches human beings by means of the Sacraments. It is something active. I myself can attest, and many other priests along with me, that people suffering from an illness recover after having received the Anointing, but also that there is a recovery of the soul after Confession or because of their frequenting the Eucharist. The Sacraments have an effect; they have consequences because they are causes. These are consequences of the divine presence, which is what acts in the divine liturgy. The Pope said to the parish priests of Rome this year that the Sacraments are meant to lead us into Christ’s being, into into the divine existence.
· Apart from certain utopians, who lack pastoral sense and would like an immediate restoration of everything, should we not ask ourselves how to act gently but firmly in order to improve gradually certain aspects of the liturgy? How should we act in this necessary but lengthy process? How should we adapt ourselves to reality without resorting to thousands of compromises?
It is necessary to take into account the historical moment in which we are living, where we have a general crisis of authority, be it that of the father, of the State, or of the Church (even within the Church). As we have said, we risk ending up with a kind of “do-it-yourself” approach. Today we are living in a state of wide-spread lawlessness, even though everybody appeals to law when their own rights are being trampled on.
The rights of God, however, are always forgotten. How would it possible to demand observance of the liturgical norms if we do not first explain what the “jus divinum” [divine right] of the liturgy is? Today nobody knows it any more. Thus it is first of all necessary to explain the meaning of the rules. It is somewhat like moral theology: the determination of a law is first of all based on the comprehension of its principles. And it is a well-known fact that when we talk about the liturgy and the Sacraments there are moral aspects. At first, I would say, it is necessary to understand that the meaning of the rules comes from the conviction that the “first law” is to love God: “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God; and Thou shalt have no other gods before me.” It is not possible to worship according to one’s own image; if you do, then you distort [the image of] God. In our days, not only do we imagine a god and afterwards invent a cult around that figure, but we even imagine worship for which we then invent a corresponding god. Idolatry means “a distorted idea of God.” This is the reality which surrounds us.
In his letter to the bishops, where he explains the meaning of the lifting of the excommunication of the bishops consecrated by Archbishop Lefebvre, Pope Benedict XVI wished to explain to those who reproached him for being concerned with secondary problems—such as those relating to the liturgy—that at a time when the meaning of the Faith and of the Sacred is everywhere becoming extinct, the privileged place for encountering God must be found precisely in the liturgy. The liturgy is and remains the most suitable place to encounter God; therefore, the Pope, when treating of the liturgy, is not dealing with secondary problems but with essential questions. If even the liturgy begins to speak the language of the world, how can it help man? We have to remind the “utopians” that it is necessary to have what Benedict XVI calls “the patience of love.”
· The old Offertory rite spoke eloquently to mankind about God, using profound expressions about the sacrificial power, about the nature of the Mass as a sacrifice offered to God. Can a correction in this sense be considered for the new rite [of Mass]?
It is important that the old Mass (also called the Tridentine rite but more appropriately the “rite of Gregory the Great”) become [better] known, as Martin Mosebach has recently said. This Mass received its form already under Pope Damasus and afterwards, in fact, under Gregory [the Great], and not under Saint Pius V. The only thing Pope Pius V did was to make some adjustments and to codify what already existed, retaining the enrichments of earlier centuries and putting aside what had become obsolete. With that understood, we can consider this rite of Mass, an integral part of which is the Offertory. There have been many papers written by great scholars on this subject and many have asked themselves whether it would be opportune to bring back the old Offertory, which you mentioned. However, the Holy See alone has the authority to act in this way. It is true that the logic which dictated the liturgical reform after the Second Vatican Council led to a simplification of the Offertory, because it was thought that there were several [alternative] forms of offertory prayers. In this way, the two prayers of blessing with a Judaic flavor were introduced. The secret prayer remained and became the “Prayer over the Gifts”; also the “Orate, fratres,” and those were considered to be more than sufficient. However, this simplicity, which was understood as a return to the purity of the origins, collides with liturgical tradition, with the Byzantine tradition, and with other Oriental and Occidental liturgies. The structure of the Offertory was seen by the great commentators and theologians of the Middle Age as the triumphal entry of Christ into Jerusalem, Who goes to be immolated in a sacrificial offering. It is for this reason that the offerings are already called “holy” and that the offertory was of great importance. The modern simplification, which I have described, has led many people to demand the return of the rich and beautiful prayers of the “Suscipe, sancte Pater” and the “Suscipe, Sancta Trinitas,” to mention only a few.
However, only through a wider diffusion of the old Mass will this “infection” of the new Mass by the old be possible. Therefore, the reintroduction of the “classical” Mass – if you will allow me the expression – may be a factor of great enrichinment. It is necessary to facilitate a regular Sunday [festiva] celebration of the traditional Mass, at least in every cathedral of the world, but also in every parish. This would help the faithful get used to Latin and to feel themselves part of the Catholic Church. And as a practical matter, it would help them participate in Masses held during international gatherings at [various] shrines. At the same time, I think we have to avoid re-introducing things “out of context.” By this I mean that there is a an entire ritual context connected with the things expressed [by the prayers], which cannot be brought back simply by inserting a prayer; a more complex kind of work is involved here.
In the photo: the Pope celebrating Mass towards the cross· Regarding the rediscovery of the exigencies which you have mentioned, there is, however, a difficult step to take, namely the practical choices to be made. How should one proceed?
In my humble opinion, the priority must be to make the faithful understand the sense of the Divine. Man seeks God, seeks the Sacred and that which is the sign of the Sacred. In his natural need to turn to God and to worship Him, man seeks the encounter with God in the sacred forms of [the Church’s] rites. If one obscures the true sacrality of Christian worship, man will continue groping about, but in a distorted way because he is lost. How then can man respond correctly to this need? Above all he should be able to find in the Church that which is the definition par excellence of the Sacred: the Eucharistic Jesus. The tabernacle must return to the center. It is true, historically, that in the great basilicas or in cathedrals the tabernacle was placed in a side chapel. It is well known that with the Tridentine reform the preference was instead to place the tabernacle in the center, also in order to oppose the Protestant errors on the real, true and substantial Presence of the Lord. But it is also true that today the outlook of those around us disputes not only the Real Presence but even the presence of the Divine. In religion man naturally seeks the encounter with the Divine, but this presence of the Divine cannot be reduced to something purely spiritual. This presence must be “touched” and this is not done with the help of a book. It is not possible to speak of the presence of the Divine only in terms relating to the reading of Sacred Scripture. When the Word of God is proclaimed, then naturally it is correct to speak of the presence of the Divine, but it is a spiritual presence, not the real, true and substantial presence of the Eucharist. Therefore, it is essential that the tabernacle be placed in the center, thereby showing the central importance of the presence of the Body of Christ. The central place cannot be the chair of the celebrant; at the center of our Faith there is not a man but Jesus in the Eucharist. Otherwise, we end up making the church like a lecture hall, like a worldly tribunal, at the center of which is a man.
The priest is a minister and cannot be in the center. In the center is the Eucharistic Jesus Christ, the tabernacle, the cross. That is where we must begin. Otherwise we lose the sense of the Divine. The tabernacle is what must draw the eye by being in the center of each church.
· In his homily of Sepember 24, 2007, in Saint-Eloi, Cardinal Castrillon said that the Church needs institutes that “specialize” in the traditional liturgy. Do you think that institutes linked to the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei may play a key role today in the formation of priests or in the rediscovery of the riches of Tradition?
Certainly! These institutes exercise a charism of their own, and a charism is something within the Church and at the service of the Church. It can be considerably advantageous to a diocese to make use of their assistance. What would have happened to the Franciscan order had the Pope not recognized it and made it available for the good of the entire Church?
Compostelan Holy Year + 2010 + Año Santo Compostelano

• Holy Years are the ones in which the 25 of July falls on a Sunday• In order to gain the jubilee one must:1. Visit during the Holy Year the Apostolic basilica of St. James of Compostela,2. Pray for the intentions of the Holy Father (at least one Credo and one Our Father),3. Receive the sacraments of Confession and Communion within the period between fifteen days before and after the visit to Compostela.• The grace of the jubilee is a Plenary Indulgence which remits the temporal punishment due for all sins.All pilgrims who have walked for at least 100 kilometres of the Way of Santiago, or who have travelled at least 200 kilometres on horseback or bike riding, and who can accredit their journey with documentation sealed in the parishes and designated posts along the way (the credencial del peregrino), are eligible to receive the Compostelana, a beautiful document in Latin issued by the Chapter of the basilica, authentic testimonial of having visited Santiago as a true pilgrim.
And we will sing at the Pórtico de la Gloria the Ultreya of the Codex Callixtinus, echoing in every accent the old cry of Compostela: Onward! Keep on going! For God and the great St. James!
Herru Sanctiagu
Grot Sanctiagu,
E ultreja e sus eja!
Deus adjuva nos!
Scandal in the Diocese of... ROME
A gay priest sex scandal has rocked the Catholic Church in Italy today after a weekly news magazine released details of a shock investigation it had carried out.Using hidden cameras, a journalist from Panorama magazine - owned by Italian Prime Minister and media baron Silvio Berlusconi - filmed three priests as they attended gay nightspots and had casual sex.Today there was no immediate comment from the Italian Bishops Conference and the Vatican - which has been rocked by a series of sex scandals involving paedophile priests since the start of the year.
The Vicar of Rome today called on homosexual clergymen in the Catholic Church to “come out” and leave the priesthood. ... “No one is forcing them to stay in the priesthood to exploit the benefits,” the Diocese of Rome said in a statement posted on its Web Site. “If they are coherent, they should come out into the open.”
New Belgian bishops' spokesman argues same-sex 'marriage,' women priests
André Bishop Joseph Leonard and the Episcopal Conference of Belgium has appointed Jürgen Mettepenningen as their spokesman, effective August 1, according to Osservatore Vaticano.
Mettepenningen, who has earned a doctorate in theology from the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Catholic University of Leuven), has written in a published book that:
1. The Church has opened the priesthood to women; 2. The Church must recognize same-sex "marriage" and is currently discriminating against them by not recognizing it; and 3. "Considering that the phrases used during the celebration of the Eucharist must be refreshed, he justifies this position by the fact that we cannot, in his words, 'preach a message of life in a dead language.'"
How far must Belgian Church fall to hit rock bottom? (Please remember to follow @RorateCaeli on Twitter)
New chapter in Thiberville affair

The Catholic faithful of the parish of Thiberville fully rejoice to learn that the highest court of the Holy See, the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, entitled Father F. Michel, Parish Priest of Thiberville, to explain, at length, his claims, by accepting the appeal that he had presented.Contrary to public assertions by Bishop C. Nourrichard [Bishop of Évreux], no final decision has been reached by Roman authorities, currently examining several other matters.
Because they have been so absent from European politics
in the past 200 years...
EU to hold atheist and freemason summitBrussels is to hold an EU summit with atheists and freemasons in the autumn, inviting them to a political dialogue parallel to the annual summit the bloc holds with Europe's religious leaders.While the EU is a secular body, the three European presidents, of the commission, parliament and EU Council, alongside two commissioners, on Monday met with 24 bishops, chief rabbis, and muftis as well as leaders from the Hindu and Sikh communities. The annual dialogue, which has taken place since 2005, is for the first time this year made legally obligatory under Article 17 of the Lisbon Treaty.Under pressure from Belgium, which constitutionally protects and financially supports humanist organisations as well as churches, the EU has been forced to hold a mirror-image summit, but of atheists, scheduled for 15 October.However, in a move that perplexed and annoyed humanist groups, the EU atheist summit will also welcome under the rubric of ‘non-religious groups', the Freemasons, the secretive fraternal organisation, according to commission spokeswoman Katharina von Schnurbein.
Centennial
Notre Charge Apostolique
I - What was the Sillon?
About the close of the nineteenth century Marc Sangnier and some of his friends founded the society called the "Sillon" (the Furrow). Convinced that in future democracy, which they took as their ideal, would rule the State and society, and desiring to prevent its degeneration under bad and godless leaders, while hoping to keep it from turning against the Church, these young men resolved to build up a democratic constituency of high-minded Christians devoted to the Church and well-informed on political and social questions. The idealism characteristic of the "Sillon" has gained for it the respect of the working-classes. In the beginning the tendencies of the society were not clear, as was shown in the first four general meetings: Paris, 1902; Tours, 1903; Lyons, 1904; Paris, 1905. More definiteness of plan was evident at the later gatherings, Paris, 1906; Orléans, 1907; and especially at Paris, 1908, giving promise that the "Sillon" would develop into a socio-political party taking an active part in national politics. This explains why it asserted its independence of the bishops and intention always to support any political measure that may aid in improving the condition of the working-classes, and especially all efforts aiming at thorough social regeneration and a genuinely democratic form of society and government. Only in this way, it is held, will the workman be able to obtain an equal share of the material, intellectual, and moral possessions belonging to the whole nation. Collectivism is absolutely rejected by the association. The growth of the "Sillon" into an independent socio-political party, its refusal to be "avant tout catholique" [Catholic in the first place] aroused the distrust of some of the bishops. Consequently the clergy held back from it. Nevertheless, the membership did not fall off. The first congress represented 45 members; the second, 300; the third, 800; the fourth, 1100; the fifth, 1500; the sixth, 1896. The "Fédération gymnastique et sportive des patronages catholiquesde France" intended to aid all Catholic societies in honour of a local saint by arranging sports for the members of the patronage has held annual meetings since 1898 when the federation began in a union of 13 patronages; the number is now 450, representing 50,000 young people in all parts of France.
[To be continued.]This[the foundation of the movement] was shortly after Our Predecessor Leo XIII of happy memory had issued his remarkable Encyclical on the condition of the working class [Rerum Novarum]. Speaking through her supreme leader, the Church had just poured out of the tenderness of her motherly love over the humble and the lowly, and it looked as though she was calling out for an ever growing number of people to labor for the restoration of order and justice in our uneasy society.Was it not opportune, then, for the leaders of the Sillon to come forward and place at the service of the Church their troops of young believers who could fulfill her wishes and her hopes? And, in fact, the Sillon did raise among the workers the standard of Jesus Christ, the symbol of salvation for peoples and nations. Nourishing its social action at the fountain of divine grace, it did impose a respect for religion upon the least willing groups, accustoming the ignorant and the impious to hearing the Word of God. And, not seldom, during public debates, stung by a question, or sarcasm, you saw them jumping to their feet and proudly proclaiming their faith in the face of a hostile audience. This was the heyday of the Sillon; its brighter side accounts for the encouragement, and tokens of approval, which the bishops and the Holy See gave liberally when this religious fervor was still obscuring the true nature of the Sillonist movement.
Return to Dominican tradition in Washington, D.C.
Why have "I Can't Believe It's Not Butter"
when you are able to eat REAL BUTTER?

Since 2005, the number of every-Sunday New Masses in Latin in the U.S.A. has fallen from 58 to 39. The number of dioceses in the U.S.A. offering this Mass every Sunday has fallen from 36 to 28.At present, the ratio of T.L.M.s to N.O.M.s in Latin is 9:1. The ratio of dioceses offering the two Masses is 5:1. My conclusion is that the N.O.M. in Latin is a dead duck. It is dying fast (but quietly). Bad news for the Adoremus movement, Frs. Harrison and Fessio, and the Hitchcocks. They hitched themselves to the wrong waggon. Fessio displeased the Pizza king in Florida (Ave Maria U.) and is now more or less nowhere. Harrison has been busy trying to square the circle by explaning how Dignitatis Humanæ is compatible with Quanta Cura and the Syllabus of Errors of 1864. Good luck to him on that. I'm planning on climbing Mt. Everest next year.If we examine more closely where the Latin N.O.M. is offered, we can see that this fake substitute that has no place in the ancient patrimoney of Holy Church was and is being used to 'shut out' the real thing. For example, Cardinal Baloney of Los Angeles tried to arrange Latin N.O.s to lure people away from the real thing. But while some of these persist, there are now more T.L.M.s in his Archdiocese than N.O.M.s in Latin. Come February of next year, this bad man will be gone (and preferably in prison). He has failed in his endeavour to stamp out tradition, just as he's failed to stamp out truth.Another place where Latin N.O.s abound is the Archdiocese of Detroit. The former Archbishop, Adam Cardinal Maida, pulled out all the stops in the 1990s to prevent celebration of the T.L.M. One method was to offer the N.O.M. in Latin as a sung Mass with beautiful music and a traditional setting. It didn't work. Local traditionalists drove to the Diocese of Lansing to refuse him, some went to the many Eastern Divine Liturgies in Detroit, and some crossed the Canadian border, where a traditionalist priest of the Diocese of London put a Sunday T.L.M. right on the other side of the bridge in Windsor! Of course, there were those who were fooled by Maida. Happily, he has now passed the age of 80 and will therefore not be able to poison the next conclave. Meanwhile, his every-Sunday Latin N.O. Masses are now down to 3. Meanwhile, the T.L.M. has arrived in force under the new Archbishop. Under Maida, there were 0 and finally 1 of these every Sunday. Now there are five.The problem persists in Las Vegas, where Bishop Pepe uses every trick in the book to keep our Mass out of his diocese, at least on Sundays. But he has THREE every-Sunday N.O.M.s in Latin. This is a man who cannot see the writing on the wall, or who just doesn't care what it says. No one can force him to read it.There were once many N.O.s in Latin in the A. of San Francisco. Now there is only one, and the T.L.M. is also available every Sunday--now that Levada is gone. Levada was not so bad in terms of his views. The problem was that he was too chicken to stand up to the apparatchiks in his diocesan curia.There were once numerous every-Sunday T.L.M.s in the Diocese of Arlington, in Virginia, under that Bishop who died of a heart attack while waiting to see the Pope in Rome (forgotten his name now). Under his successor we see a reversal: the Latin N.O.M.s are down to one per Sunday and the T.L.M.s have essentially replaced their rivals. It's all over.The present Bishop of Orange continues to have two every-Sunday N.O.M.s in Latin but has not forbidden our Mass and we now have four of them every Sunday--twice as many.The A. of St. Paul & Minneapolis still has two every-Su. N.O.M.s in Latin, a hold-over from the endless years in which the State fo Minnesota was a black hole for tradition.Las Vegas is the only Diocese in the U.S.A. that has the Latin N.O.M. every Sunday but not one T.L.M. approved by the diocese. The S.S.P.X is present there; so is an independent priest. Las Vegas also has the distinction of being BY FAR the most populous U.S. see not having our Mass on the every-Sunday basis. Really, someone from Rome needs to have a little talk with Bishop Pepe.
Ordinations
Good Queen Mary

The use of the rod can actually be a service of love. Today we can see that it has nothing to do with love when conduct unworthy of the priestly life is tolerated. Nor does it have to do with love if heresy is allowed to spread and the faith twisted and chipped away, as if it were something that we ourselves had invented. As if it were no longer God’s gift, the precious pearl which we cannot let be taken from us.
Fifteenth Annual Pilgrimage for Restoration
Reparation for sin.
Restoration by grace.
Reform of life.
Join the 15th annual "Pilgrimage for Restoration" to the Shrine of Our Lady of the North American Martyrs, Auriesville, New York.
September 22 - 25, 2010
Check it out at www.national-coalition.org/pilgrim/.
Walk, sing, pray along the paths, the actual places where the North American Saints lived and died for Christ, for their persecutors, and for you.
Join one day or four, for 7 miles or 70. Transportation for weary pilgrims provided throughout.
'Modified pilgrimage' for parents with young children, and for seniors.
Traditional Roman Mass (forma extraordinaria) and confessions daily. Plenary indulgence.
For more info, including a schedule of events, send your postal address to lloydg@national-coalition.org.
Register online at http://www.national-coalition.org/pilgrim/registration.html.
Request prayers or sponsor pilgrims at www.national-coalition.org/pilgrim/PilgwoTrvl.html.
Inquiries? Call the National Coalition 610/435-2634, or e-mail Pilgrimage Director lloydg@national-coalition.org.
Looking for spiritual adventure, heroic challenge, Catholic fellowship? Bring the family, come with friends. Join Catholics from all over North America and beyond.
Pass this info along.
www.national-coalition.org
lloydg@national-coalition.org
610/435-2634 tel
National Coalition of Clergy & Laity
621 Jordan Circle
Whitehall, PA 18052-7119 USA
The Pilgrimage for Restoration
Auriesville Pilgrimage is about the Conversion of America
For our edification
Another video can be found here.
The lesson of the Dishonest Steward

Today (...), through a parable that inspires in us a certain surprise since it speaks of a dishonest steward who is praised (cf. Lk 16: 1-13), a close look reveals that here the Lord has reserved a serious and particularly salutary teaching for us.
As always, the Lord draws inspiration from the events of daily life: he tells of a steward who is on the point of being dismissed for dishonest management of his master's affairs and who, to assure a future for himself, cunningly seeks to come to an arrangement with his master's debtors. He is undoubtedly dishonest but clever: the Gospel does not present him to us as a model to follow in his dishonesty, but rather as an example to be imitated for his farsighted guile. The short parable ends, in fact, with these words: "The master commended the dishonest steward for his prudence" (Lk 16: 8).
But what does Jesus wish to tell us with this parable? And with its surprising conclusion? The Evangelist follows the parable of the dishonest steward with a short series of sayings and recommendations on the relationship we must have with money and the goods of this earth. These short sentences are an invitation to a choice that presupposes a radical decision, a constant inner tension. Life is truly always a choice: between honesty and dishonesty, between fidelity and infidelity, between selfishness and altruism, between good and evil. The conclusion of this Gospel passage is incisive and peremptory: "No servant can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other".
Ultimately, Jesus says, "You cannot serve God and mammon" (Lk 16: 13). Mammon is a term of Phoenician origin that calls to mind economic security and success in business; we might say that riches are shown as the idol to which everything is sacrificed in order to attain one's own material success; hence, this economic success becomes a person's true god. As a result, it is necessary to make a fundamental decision between God and mammon, it is necessary to choose between the logic of profit as the ultimate criterion for our action, and the logic of sharing and solidarity. ...
Basically, it is a matter of choosing between selfishness and love, between justice and dishonesty and ultimately, between God and Satan. If loving Christ and one's brethren is not to be considered as something incidental and superficial but, rather, the true and ultimate purpose of our whole existence, it will be necessary to know how to make basic choices, to be prepared to make radical renouncements, if necessary even to the point of martyrdom. Today, as yesterday, Christian life demands the courage to go against the tide, to love like Jesus, who even went so far as to sacrifice himself on the Cross.


