Rorate Caeli

"The old rite is the Church’s greatest treasure, her emergency kit, her Noah’s ark"

This is "old news" but still worth reading.

The blog of the Society of St. Hugh of Cluny has published a translation of yet another interview with Martin Mosebach, the renowned novelist and author of The Heresy of Formlessness. (An excerpt of this excellent book can be found here.) This particular interview was published in May of this year in the Sueddeutsche Zeitung Magazin, and is entitled "It would be a Catastrophe if the Church would throw her Principles Overboard." in the translation.
Other recently-translated interviews and articles of Mr. Mosebach are "The Body of the Church" (on the lifting of the excommunication of the SSPX bishops), "After all, he is only the Pope" (a defense of Pope Benedict XVI vis-a-vis the sex scandals) and "The Reform of the Liturgy and the Catholic Church".
The following is an excerpt from the translation of the Sueddeutsche Zeitung interview:
You are an adherent of the Tridentine mass. Do you remember your first old mass?
It was with a priest in Hattenheim, an ugly suburb of Frankfurt, in a musty and desolate location. The priest was pastor Hans Milch, a powerful thunderer from the pulpit, a wild, boisterous and eccentric man. He had been discharged by the bishop and had built for himself a missionary hut in this dreadful Hattenheim. Now defenders of the old rite are readily suspected of “aestheticism.” But it was in these surroundings, so remote from all beauty, that I learned that the liturgy builds its own cathedral.
Do you mean that Pastor Milch who sympathized with the FSSPX?
Milch had the characteristics of a genius, but he was too expressionistic for my taste. His sermons ruptured the liturgy.
The content didn’t matter to you?
The cult is always more important than any sermon, however clever. The objectivity of cult is the greatest and most important thing our age needs. The old rite is the Church’s greatest treasure, her emergency kit, her Noah’s ark.
This weekend the ecumenical church convention it taking place in Munich. Are you going to be there?
Certainly not. I don’t have to run into cheerful people with a sect-member’s smile. This is the Reichsparteitag of organized Christianity – dreadful!
What’s so dreadful about it?
The idea itself - like a military review. The sentimental ecumenism. The “we” feeling. What counts in religion is the individual and his personal relationship with God. I find terrible this getting carried away by the crowd. Liturgical tradition breathes a sober, almost reserved spirit. It doesn’t serve as a massage for the soul.
What do you mean by “massage for the soul?”
I mean the Church must be nothing like a health outing. Christianity is not easily consumable. On the contrary, religion encounters man as something foreign, as the “totally other.” She challenges him to leave his place and set out to explore her strangeness and profundity. Religion has to act upon man first as foreign and difficult. Terrible simplification leads to great illusions and finally to a hangover.
She always has to have a plan contrary to the spirit of the times?
That is her most precious possession. The Church is always a counter – society. She is always a crack in the wall of the total present. That binds me to the Church and makes her necessary for me until my death.
What happens to you when you can’t attend mass for two or three weeks?
Then I know that I am living wrong.
What is the matter with you then?
What’s the matter with me? That I have not joined myself to this objective icon. That I have not, for once, disregarded myself and entered into the spell of reality, into a world that doesn’t run according to my laws.

"In the center is the Eucharistic Jesus Christ, the tabernacle, the cross. That is where we must begin. Otherwise we lose the sense of the Divine."

The following is a translation of an interview with Msgr. Nicola Bux published on the blog Disputationes Theologicae on April 24, 2010. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first English translation of this particular interview to be published anywhere. Many thanks to the friends of Rorate who labored on this translation.


The following translations of other interviews with Msgr. Bux can be found on Rorate:


Interview with Monsignor Nicola Bux


In the framework of a deepening of the debate on the liturgy and on the so-called “reform of the reform,” the editors of Disputationes Theologicae have interviewed one of the most prominent liturgists, Monsignor Nicola Bux. Born in 1947, he was ordained a priest in 1975 and has done research at the Ecumenical Institute, at the Biblicum in Jerusalem, and at the Istituto Sant’Anselmo in Rome. He is Professor of Sacramental Theology at the Theological Faculty in Bari (Italy) and is one of the most esteemed collaborators of the Holy Father, Benedict XVI. The author of numerous publications on dogmatic theology and liturgy, he recently published his noted text “The Reform of Benedict XVI.” Msgr. Bux is now a Consultor of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, the Congregation for the Causes of Saints, and the Office for Pontifical Celebrations. He is a consultant for the review Communio and also a specialist in the liturgy of the Eastern Rites.


Mons. Nicola Bux
· Monsignor, you are a professor of Sacramental Theology and also said to be one of the experts on the liturgy closest to the Pope. Is this a sign that it is not possible to speak about Liturgy without [sound] doctrine?

It is well known that the liturgy pertains to the dogma of the Church. Everybody knows that the faith of the Church is close to the liturgy and that from prayer one returns to dogma. Everybody knows the saying, “lex orandi lex credendi.” And it is from the way we pray that we understand what we believe, but it is also from the way we believe that we derive the way to pray. This had been taken up and wisely developed in the encyclical Mediator Dei of the Venerable Servant of God Pius XII.

· For a while now even the most tenacious supporters of a “permanent revolution” in the liturgy seem to give in before the wise argumentation of the Pope, of which there’s a clear echo in your book. Are we witnessing a new (or old if you prefer) vision of the liturgy?

Liturgy is, by its nature, of divine institution, based on the unchangeable will of its divine Founder. Because this is in fact the basis of the liturgy, we may affirm that the liturgy is “of divine right.” It is not by chance that the Orientals use the term “Divine Liturgy,” because this is God’s work, the “opus Dei”, as Saint Benedict says. The liturgy is not of a thing of human origin. In the conciliar document on the liturgy, in no. 22, § 3, it is clearly stated that no one, not even a priest, may add, take away, or change anything. Why? The liturgy belongs to the Lord. During Lent, we read the passages from Deuteronomy where God Himself establishes the practical details of worship. In the New Testament, it is Jesus Himself Who tells the disciples how they should prepare the supper. God has the right to be adored as He wishes and not as we wish. Otherwise we fall into a cult of “idolatry” in the proper meaning of the Greek term, i.e. worship made in our own image. When the liturgy mirrors the tastes or creative tendencies of the priest or of a group of the laity it becomes “idolatry.” Catholic worship is worship in spirit and in truth; it is a turning towards the Father, in the Holy Spirit, but it has to pass through Jesus Christ, has to pass through the Truth. Therefore, it is necessary to rediscover that God has the right to be adored as He Himself has established. The ritual forms aren’t a matter “to be interpreted,” because these forms come out of the discerned faith, which becomes, in a certain sense, the culture of the Church. The Church has always been anxious that the rites not be the product of subjective tastes but the exact expression of the entire Church, which is “catholic.” The liturgy is catholic, universal. Therefore, even when we are dealing with a particular celebration held in a particular place, it is not possible to celebrate it in contrast to the “catholic” physiognomy of liturgy.

· Unfortunately, we find ourselves confronted with an attitude of the clergy by which—even if they do not openly deny the efficacy of the Sacraments—they too often leave aside the so-called “ex opere operato” aspect of the Sacrament, so that it is almost reduced to being a mere “symbol.” Is the cause perhaps to be found in the loss of a traditional “rituality”?

The reason for this is that one has forgotten that worship is not given to an imaginary God, but to a God Who is present, a God Who acts, that is to the Lord Jesus. Sacrosanctum Concilium n. 7 even explains to us the modes of this presence. Such an article is almost charged with the weight of Mediator Dei , to which it adds the presence in the Word. It is clearly explained here that the liturgy has its raison d’être in the presence of God; otherwise it becomes self-referential, it becomes empty.

Forgetting, under-valuing the Lord’s presence, which is at its fullest in the Eucharist, where He is truly, really, and substantially present, is the reason for the drifting away you mention. With such a deformation, one ends up defining the liturgy [erroneously] as a conjunction of symbols and signs, as one can sometimes hear people say; in this framework, “sign” is understood only as “something which refers to something else.” The idea that the sign is at one with what it signifies is not present. That, though, is where [the notion of] the Sacrament arises. When this aspect is lost, the Sacraments are reduced to mere symbols. One loses the sense of their “efficacy,” of the effects that they cause. There is no longer an understanding of the Lord Who “acts,” Who “works” through the Sacraments. This is the meaning of the classical expression “ex opere operato,” which is a bit strange, but which means that the efficacy of the Sacrament derives from Him who operates in it. I will take the example of a drug [medicine]. In appearance you see a bottle or a pill or a liquid, but it is not only the symbol of the remedy which the doctor wants to bring about, because we assume that if we take them they will cure us and heal us; that is, the effects take hold. The author of this effect is the Lord, Who is present and operating in the sacramental rite. St. Leo the Great, who is cited in The Catechism of the Catholic Church, says that after the Ascension, all that was visible of the Lord here on earth passed into the Sacraments. It is in this way that the Lord continues to be present and visible to us in our own days. It is necessary that we look at things in this light if we wish to understand Saint Thomas [Aquinas] when he speaks of the “matter” of the Sacraments. If we do not return to this kind of realistic expression, we will not be able to understand the Sacraments. The divine presence is not only something that we look at as something “symbolic” but as something which touches human beings by means of the Sacraments. It is something active. I myself can attest, and many other priests along with me, that people suffering from an illness recover after having received the Anointing, but also that there is a recovery of the soul after Confession or because of their frequenting the Eucharist. The Sacraments have an effect; they have consequences because they are causes. These are consequences of the divine presence, which is what acts in the divine liturgy. The Pope said to the parish priests of Rome this year that the Sacraments are meant to lead us into Christ’s being, into into the divine existence.

· Apart from certain utopians, who lack pastoral sense and would like an immediate restoration of everything, should we not ask ourselves how to act gently but firmly in order to improve gradually certain aspects of the liturgy? How should we act in this necessary but lengthy process? How should we adapt ourselves to reality without resorting to thousands of compromises?

It is necessary to take into account the historical moment in which we are living, where we have a general crisis of authority, be it that of the father, of the State, or of the Church (even within the Church). As we have said, we risk ending up with a kind of “do-it-yourself” approach. Today we are living in a state of wide-spread lawlessness, even though everybody appeals to law when their own rights are being trampled on.

The rights of God, however, are always forgotten. How would it possible to demand observance of the liturgical norms if we do not first explain what the “jus divinum” [divine right] of the liturgy is? Today nobody knows it any more. Thus it is first of all necessary to explain the meaning of the rules. It is somewhat like moral theology: the determination of a law is first of all based on the comprehension of its principles. And it is a well-known fact that when we talk about the liturgy and the Sacraments there are moral aspects. At first, I would say, it is necessary to understand that the meaning of the rules comes from the conviction that the “first law” is to love God: “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God; and Thou shalt have no other gods before me.” It is not possible to worship according to one’s own image; if you do, then you distort [the image of] God. In our days, not only do we imagine a god and afterwards invent a cult around that figure, but we even imagine worship for which we then invent a corresponding god. Idolatry means “a distorted idea of God.” This is the reality which surrounds us.

In his letter to the bishops, where he explains the meaning of the lifting of the excommunication of the bishops consecrated by Archbishop Lefebvre, Pope Benedict XVI wished to explain to those who reproached him for being concerned with secondary problems—such as those relating to the liturgy—that at a time when the meaning of the Faith and of the Sacred is everywhere becoming extinct, the privileged place for encountering God must be found precisely in the liturgy. The liturgy is and remains the most suitable place to encounter God; therefore, the Pope, when treating of the liturgy, is not dealing with secondary problems but with essential questions. If even the liturgy begins to speak the language of the world, how can it help man? We have to remind the “utopians” that it is necessary to have what Benedict XVI calls “the patience of love.”

· The old Offertory rite spoke eloquently to mankind about God, using profound expressions about the sacrificial power, about the nature of the Mass as a sacrifice offered to God. Can a correction in this sense be considered for the new rite [of Mass]?

It is important that the old Mass (also called the Tridentine rite but more appropriately the “rite of Gregory the Great”) become [better] known, as Martin Mosebach has recently said. This Mass received its form already under Pope Damasus and afterwards, in fact, under Gregory [the Great], and not under Saint Pius V. The only thing Pope Pius V did was to make some adjustments and to codify what already existed, retaining the enrichments of earlier centuries and putting aside what had become obsolete. With that understood, we can consider this rite of Mass, an integral part of which is the Offertory. There have been many papers written by great scholars on this subject and many have asked themselves whether it would be opportune to bring back the old Offertory, which you mentioned. However, the Holy See alone has the authority to act in this way. It is true that the logic which dictated the liturgical reform after the Second Vatican Council led to a simplification of the Offertory, because it was thought that there were several [alternative] forms of offertory prayers. In this way, the two prayers of blessing with a Judaic flavor were introduced. The secret prayer remained and became the “Prayer over the Gifts”; also the “Orate, fratres,” and those were considered to be more than sufficient. However, this simplicity, which was understood as a return to the purity of the origins, collides with liturgical tradition, with the Byzantine tradition, and with other Oriental and Occidental liturgies. The structure of the Offertory was seen by the great commentators and theologians of the Middle Age as the triumphal entry of Christ into Jerusalem, Who goes to be immolated in a sacrificial offering. It is for this reason that the offerings are already called “holy” and that the offertory was of great importance. The modern simplification, which I have described, has led many people to demand the return of the rich and beautiful prayers of the “Suscipe, sancte Pater” and the “Suscipe, Sancta Trinitas,” to mention only a few.

However, only through a wider diffusion of the old Mass will this “infection” of the new Mass by the old be possible. Therefore, the reintroduction of the “classical” Mass – if you will allow me the expression – may be a factor of great enrichinment. It is necessary to facilitate a regular Sunday [festiva] celebration of the traditional Mass, at least in every cathedral of the world, but also in every parish. This would help the faithful get used to Latin and to feel themselves part of the Catholic Church. And as a practical matter, it would help them participate in Masses held during international gatherings at [various] shrines. At the same time, I think we have to avoid re-introducing things “out of context.” By this I mean that there is a an entire ritual context connected with the things expressed [by the prayers], which cannot be brought back simply by inserting a prayer; a more complex kind of work is involved here.
· The series of gestures and orientation certainly are of great importance, because what the faithful see is a reflection of an invisible reality. Is having the cross at the center of the altar a way to call to mind what the Mass is?


In the photo: the Pope celebrating Mass towards the cross


Yes, having the cross at the center of the altar is a way to bring to mind what the Mass is. I do not speak of a “miniature” cross but of a cross such as can be seen. The dimensions of the cross should be proportional to the ecclesial space. It should be brought back to the center [of the altar], aligned with the altar, and everybody must be able to see it. It should be the focal point of the faithful and of the priest, as [the former Cardinal] Joseph Ratzinger says in his Introduction to the Spirit of the Liturgy. It should be in the center, independently of the celebration, even if it is Mass “facing the people.” I insist on a cross that is clearly visible. Otherwise, what is the use of an image that cannot be sufficiently profited from? Images refer to the prototype. We all know that historically there have been those who were against the use of images, for example Epiphanius of Salamis, or even the Cistercians; however, the cult of images prevailed at Nicea II in 787, on the foundation of what Saint John Damascene said: “The image recalls the exemplar.” This is still valid for our so-called Civilization of the Image. In an era in which vision has become the favored medium of our contemporaries, it does not suffice to have a little cross that lies flat or an illegible “sketch” of a cross, but it is necessary that the cross, along with the figure of the Crucified, be clearly visible on the altar, regardless of the angle from which it is viewed.

· Regarding the rediscovery of the exigencies which you have mentioned, there is, however, a difficult step to take, namely the practical choices to be made. How should one proceed?

In my humble opinion, the priority must be to make the faithful understand the sense of the Divine. Man seeks God, seeks the Sacred and that which is the sign of the Sacred. In his natural need to turn to God and to worship Him, man seeks the encounter with God in the sacred forms of [the Church’s] rites. If one obscures the true sacrality of Christian worship, man will continue groping about, but in a distorted way because he is lost. How then can man respond correctly to this need? Above all he should be able to find in the Church that which is the definition par excellence of the Sacred: the Eucharistic Jesus. The tabernacle must return to the center. It is true, historically, that in the great basilicas or in cathedrals the tabernacle was placed in a side chapel. It is well known that with the Tridentine reform the preference was instead to place the tabernacle in the center, also in order to oppose the Protestant errors on the real, true and substantial Presence of the Lord. But it is also true that today the outlook of those around us disputes not only the Real Presence but even the presence of the Divine. In religion man naturally seeks the encounter with the Divine, but this presence of the Divine cannot be reduced to something purely spiritual. This presence must be “touched” and this is not done with the help of a book. It is not possible to speak of the presence of the Divine only in terms relating to the reading of Sacred Scripture. When the Word of God is proclaimed, then naturally it is correct to speak of the presence of the Divine, but it is a spiritual presence, not the real, true and substantial presence of the Eucharist. Therefore, it is essential that the tabernacle be placed in the center, thereby showing the central importance of the presence of the Body of Christ. The central place cannot be the chair of the celebrant; at the center of our Faith there is not a man but Jesus in the Eucharist. Otherwise, we end up making the church like a lecture hall, like a worldly tribunal, at the center of which is a man.

The priest is a minister and cannot be in the center. In the center is the Eucharistic Jesus Christ, the tabernacle, the cross. That is where we must begin. Otherwise we lose the sense of the Divine. The tabernacle is what must draw the eye by being in the center of each church.

· In his homily of Sepember 24, 2007, in Saint-Eloi, Cardinal Castrillon said that the Church needs institutes that “specialize” in the traditional liturgy. Do you think that institutes linked to the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei may play a key role today in the formation of priests or in the rediscovery of the riches of Tradition?

Certainly! These institutes exercise a charism of their own, and a charism is something within the Church and at the service of the Church. It can be considerably advantageous to a diocese to make use of their assistance. What would have happened to the Franciscan order had the Pope not recognized it and made it available for the good of the entire Church?

Compostelan Holy Year + 2010 + Año Santo Compostelano


The Way of Compostela

by Father Ramón Anglés, July 2004

1. Introduction

When the feast of the apostle St. James the Greater, July 25, falls on a Sunday, the Spanish city of Compostela awakes from its noble sleep to become once more the rejuvenated protagonist of a multisecular tradition: the pilgrimage to the resting place of Santiago, Saint Yago, or better still, Yakob Boanerges, the Son of Thunder, whose name was given by Christ Himself.

Instituted by Pope Calixtus II in 1122, the Compostelan Holy Year, now regrettably called Xacobeo for publicity reasons, attracts to the Northwest of Spain, multitudes of pilgrims and visitors.

If a tomb is usually the abode of death and solitude, the one of St. James inspires a paradoxical combination of life, history, miracles, literature, art and music. Sidus refulgens Hispaniae, resplendent star of Spain, the apostolic sepulchre has originated and given continuous life to the Way of Compostela, 850 kilometres travelled by millions along twelve centuries of a fascinating aspect in Christian civilization.

2. Origins: St. James and Spain

The Son of Thunder

James, son of Zebedee and Salome, a fisherman of the lake of Galilee, was called by the Divine Master, along with his younger brother John, to become "a fisherman of men." Our Lord, sublime psychologist who alone pierces the secrets of the heart, gave him the revealing surname of Boanerges, Son of Thunder. Elect among the elect, always impetuous and vehement, it is James who accompanies Jesus to the glory of Mount Tabor, he who conjures heavenly fire over infidel Samaria; he who, after the daring petition of his mother Salome, fulminates an immediate possumus; he is the first one to leave Palestine and to reach the confines of the earth, the finis terrae; and it is James who shares first the chalice of the Lord by being martyred in Jerusalem.

Preaching in Spain under Mary’s protection

The Acts of the Apostles report his death under Herod Agrippa, in the year 43-44, but nothing is said there about his sepulchre or about his predication in Spain.

We know by an old tradition, confirmed by St. Clement of Alexandria and by the historian Eusebius, that the apostles remained in Palestine until the year 42, twelve years after the Ascension, and this by an express order of Our Lord. Before their final dispersion, St. Peter himself made a journey to Antioch, and nothing impedes that St. James could have preached in Spain for one or two years during the same period.

We must wait until the 4th Century to read in the works of Didymus of Alexandria that one of the apostles preached the faith in Spain; the same testimony is found in St. Jerome, in his Commentary of Isaiah, written in 412, and in his contemporary Theodoret of Antioch, both referring the very early mission of one of the Twelve in Spain. Since St. Jerome was for a time the secretary of the Spanish Pope St. Damasus, and an intimate friend of the also Spanish historian Orosius, he was well informed of the oral Christian traditions in the Peninsula.

Documentary testimonies of this predication of St. James are found also in the Mozarabic Mass and Office, containing the substance of the Hispanic primitive liturgy. A hymn of 783 mentions it explicitly. Beatus of Liebana, the defender of Spanish orthodoxy against the adoptianist heresy, repeats the Jacobean tradition in the year 780; the same is commemorated by Venerable Bede in his History of the Angles, written before the year 735. The Apostolic Catalogue, which Duchesne –an adversary of the Spanish belief- dates on the 7th Century, reports that "James, son of Zebedee and brother of St. John, preached in Spain." And the medieval literature abounds in identical references, faithfully repeated by numerous authors such as Isidore, Braulius, Aldelm of Malmesbury, and many others whose assertions constitute a coherent and constant testimony, confirming the ancient oral tradition.

Intimately connected with the preaching of St. James in Spain is the veneration of Our Lady of the Pillar in Zaragoza. Since the Blessed Virgin was under the care of his brother St. John -and one can legitimately assume that also their mother and Our Lady’s sister, Mary Salome, lived in the same house-, we can picture the apostle’s conversations on his first mission, and the farewells before starting the long journey by ship that took him to the Iberian shores. From Italica, the Son of Thunder must have crossed like a whirlwind the efficient Imperial roads from one corner to the other of Hispania: Emerita, Braccara, Iria, Lucus, Asturica, Pallantia, Clunia, and finally Caesaraugusta, now Zaragoza. There, by the banks of the river Ebro, our tradition says that he wept, deeply discouraged at the apparent lack of success of his predication. Our Lady herself, brought by the angels, came to encourage him and left as a token of her protection a mysterious pillar. Modern historians as unconvinced as Villoslada must report that, since at least the year 300, there was in Zaragoza a church in which Our Lady was venerated with great fervour and solemn worship. And there, enshrined within the first Marian sanctuary of history, remains the Holy Pillar of unidentified precious jasper, exuding until this date a powerful fragrance from time to time, whose inaccessible foundations are lost deep within the rock.

Awaiting a scientific analysis which may reveal new wonders, the Pillar of Zaragoza represents the granitic, tough faith of Spain that the Son of Thunder implanted with the blessing of the Mother of God. The noblest fruits of his preaching were the Innumerable Martyrs, the Church’s extraordinary name for the thousands who died martyrs in the city of Zaragoza in the year 303, under the persecution of Diocletian.

The last journey

Returned to Jerusalem with at least two of his few Spanish converts, Theodore and Athanasius, St. James underwent his martyrdom. In their return to Spain, his disciples took with them the body of the apostle, following the commercial route which took them from the port of Haifa to the Western part the Peninsula, in Iria Flavia, now the village of Padrón, Galicia. Iria was a very Romanized city under the governorship of a close friend of Caligula, Flavius Quintus. Having left Rome at the time of the emperor’s murder in the year 41, he brought his perversions and cruelty to that corner of the Roman empire. The disciples moved inland in the rural country, burying the sacred remains in the place later known as the Campus Stellae, a gift of a Roman noblewoman, Lupa, who converted to the faith by the example of the two disciples. They remained as custodians of the relic, while their companions dispersed to bring the Gospel into the continent. The original burial place is now the area directly below the main altar of the Apostolic basilica of Compostela.

The Apostolic Sepulchre

No records of the interment exist until the 9th Century, but this can be explained by the fact that, at the end of the 1st Century and during the two following ones, bloody persecutions by the Roman authorities forbade all meetings near Christian sepulchres, destroying all ecclesiastical acts and dispersing the faithful. Further persecutions by the Suevi, in the 4th and 5th Centuries, annihilated all vestiges of Christianity. Only after the conversion of King Recaredus, at the beginning of the 7th Century, the Church could be reorganized in Galicia for a brief period, stopped short by the Moorish invasion of the early 800’s, which brought chaos throughout the North. Bishop Teodomirus rediscovered the tomb soon after, in 814, and a chapel was built in the Campus Stellae the same year by King Alfonso the Chaste, which was enlarged by Alfonso III in 901 (the traces of both early churches can be seen in the foundations of the present basilica), then destroyed by the Moor leader Almanzor in 997, and finally rebuilt with magnificence in 1077 by Bishop Diego Peláez. It was Diego Gelmírez, first archbishop of Compostela, who completed the Romanesque magnificence of the basilica which the pilgrims to Santiago can still admire behind the welcoming Baroque facade and the external ensemble of 1738, unsurpassable masterwork of Fernando Casas Novoa.

The earliest available documents date from the 9th Century, a time from which we have a myriad of written testimonials consigning the belief that the remains of St. James were kept in that very place and sepulchre. They include, among martyrologies of the 808 and 860, royal charts and privileges to the clergy of Santiago de Compostela, a letter of Pope Leo III (795-816) –contemporary of the rediscovery of the tomb by Teodomirus-, and also a relation of the monastery of Glembours, probably at the end of the 9th Century.

An exotic yet surprising mention of the tomb is found much earlier, in the Byzantine catalogues of the 7th Century, where we read that the apostle was buried in archa marmorica, "in a marble coffer."

The topography and the archaeological findings in the region reflect as well the Jacobean tradition. Padrón ("the rock," reference to the one at which the boat arrived) is the old port of Iria Flavia, and very recent excavations in its collegial church of Santa María la Mayor de Adina have unearthed the remains of a Christian church of the late 1st Century. The Pico Sacro, only 200 metres from the apostolic basilica, is an archaeological golden mine covered with primitive churches testifying to the early devotion of both clergy and faithful.

But the most important discoveries were the ones made during the excavations that have been effected regularly since 1878. They revealed three marble sepulchres, the main one belonging without doubt to the 1st Century. They are enclosed with latericium, red brick of Roman facture, with fenestrellae martyriales, small openings for the purpose of dropping ribbons who will be used as relics, also dating from the 1st Century. A rich Roman mosaic in opus tessellatum depicting Christian symbols identifies the main tomb as the one of an important Christian personage. Finally, as recently as September 1988 an inscription was cleaned on the marble plaque of one of the adjacent sepulchres, uncovering the name of Athanasios, written in Greek and in Hebrew.

The three tombs were empty, but the bones of three men were found in a recess hidden behind them. This coincides with the fact that in 1589, when the English pirate Francis Drake approached the Galician coast, Bishop Juan Sanclemente removed the relics from the sepulchres and hid them in safety behind the sacred area. The bones, examined by scientists, are as ancient as the 1st Century, which prompted Pope Leo XIII to declare the authenticity of the findings in his Bull Deus Omnipotens, November 1, 1884. They are now preserved within the precious urn which can be seen in the crypt of the basilica, a masterpiece of silver work made in the 19th Century by Compostelan artists. The Pantokrator Christ, surrounded by the Evangelists and the apostles, welcomes there the prayers of the pilgrims.

Santiago Matamoros

The finding of the sacred remains by Bishop Teodomirus signalled the general call to war against the Moorish invaders, who had by then the control of the greatest part of the Peninsula, the Northwest excepted, and had even entered into France, menacing the rest of Christendom. A small militia under King Don Pelayo had already repelled the invaders at the battle of Covadonga, in 718, starting the Reconquista of Spain.

It was at Clavijo, in 845, that the forces of King Ramiro I defeated the far superior army of Abderraman II. The galvanizing cry of the Christian soldiers was ¡Santiago y cierra España!, "For St. James, and close ranks, Spain!" The General Chronicle of King Alfonso X the Wise reports a miraculous event during the battle of Clavijo, which gave the cult of St. James a dramatic configuration. According to witnesses, Santiago was seen descending from the sky mounted on a white horse, having in one hand a snow-white banner on which was displayed a blood red cross, and in the other a sword, en un cavallo blanco con una senya blanca et grand espada reluzient en la mano. We may interpret this intervention of St. James as a precise fact or as a poetic licence; what matters is the undeniable fact of the miraculous protection of the Son of Thunder, who will become from this time on the Patron of Spain. The imagery will present him thereafter as a knight on a white horse, carrying a banner with the Cross of Santiago and wielding a flashing sword. Protector of Christendom, he became Santiago Matamoros, the Moor slayer. And the Mozarabic Office salutes him from then on as Defensor Almae Hispaniae, Jacobe, vindex hostium, "James, defender of the soul of Spain, punisher of its enemies."

If Islam was able to subjugate the Visigothic monarchy with the help of the Prophet Mohammed, the small Christian troops will counterattack with the assistance of St. James. As Américo Castro put it, Cruzadas versus Alcoranadas, or the Cross against the Koran.

The vocation of the Son of Thunder for combat against the infidels manifested itself in countless occasions during the Reconquista and every war in defence of Holy Religion, up to our days. Caudillo de Cruzados, "commander of crusaders," he was invoked by the soldiers fighting the Reds during the Spanish civil war (1936-1939) and especially during the decisive battle of the river Ebro. Generalissimo Francisco Franco went as far as stating: "If one wants to get rid of Spain, take away Santiago."

Santiago Matamoros, in the words of Félix Sardá y Salvany, the great Catalan anti-Liberal apologist, "is the most perfect and adequate representation of the faith of our people; the faith of Spain is indeed a militant faith; this is what has characterized us always an even nowadays; this is what makes incomprehensible to foreigners the major part of our history’s pages, as well as the attitudes and events of today’s Spain. One must understand that we are and want to remain heirs and disciples of an armed apostle and of a Santiago fighting bloody battles on horseback: this is the key to decipher the enigma of our apparently strange national character."

Indeed, the Catholic history of Spain is founded upon the blood of countless martyrs, from the early disciples of Santiago until those who in the tragic and glorious epopee of 1936-1939 died with a smile, forgiving their assassins and crying ¡Viva Cristo Rey!

The restoration of Christendom requires, today as ever, a militant approach to every facet of life, and Santiago is perhaps our best model. Una manu sua faciebat opus et altera tenebat gladium. Work and combat, under Mary’s protection; we should make ours these two lessons of Santiago: constant work and militant attitude in order to defend the principles of Catholic civilization.

3. The Pilgrimage

Historical development

Over the sacred remains of St. James, in the remote North-western corner of the Iberian peninsula, isolated from the world, a city grew and flourished solely by the power of religious belief, a fact unique in the world. This development was helped by the fact that the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem was in the hands of the infidels, and Rome was going through a turbulent time. As news of the discovery spread throughout Europe, along with the many miracles that took place at the site, Santiago became the devotional destination par excellence.

King Alfonso II became the first royal pilgrim, as soon as the sepulchre was rediscovered. His son, Alfonso III the Great, found in the Order of Cluny the most efficient propagandists of the new pilgrimage. He had married Constance, daughter of the Duke of Burgundy, who grew up under the influence of the French Benedictines and brought them to Spain.

The monks of Cluny, who opened thirty monasteries in the North of the Peninsula, took over the management and protection of the pilgrimage. They kept the road in good repair, established inns and monasteries at regular intervals, and gave protection against attacks by bandits. Soon the dioceses throughout northern Spain were occupied by French bishops, mostly of Cluniac origin.

The first non-Iberian pilgrim recorded to visit the Shrine was the French bishop Gottschalk, who arrived in 950. England’s King Edward I, Portugal’s Queen Isabella, Pope Calixtus and many other personalities enkindle with their example a holy fire which soon extended in all Christendom. ...

By the 13th Century, the city of Paris alone sent each year some 35,000 pilgrims. In fact, so many French made the trip that the stretch from Puente la Reina to Santiago was known as the French Way.

The Pilgrim’s Way inspired Europe’s first guide, written by the French cleric Aymeric Picaud in the early 12th Century. It introduced the golden age of the cult, when the pilgrimage had become a world wide significance, the basilica was finished, the miracles celebrated all over the western world, the story of the journey of the Apostle’s acknowledged, the hostels for the pilgrims abundant, the roads leading to the apostle’s shrine established, and the hymns sung by the faithful along the road.

Aymeric described the crypt of the basilica this way: "There lies St.James in a marble ark in a fair vaulted sepulchre wonderful for size and workmanship. It is lighted heavenly wise with carbuncles like the gem of New Jerusalem and the air is kept sweet with divine odours; waxen tapers with heavenly radiance light and angelic service cares for it...."

To go to Santiago was also like going to Rome or Jerusalem. Like the crusaders were going to reconquer the Holy Places, here they would come to expel the Infidels from Christian land. The crusaders began to arrive in the Peninsula at the end of the 11th Century to participate in the Reconquista. The direct ancestor of this writer, Raymond called "the Angle" came to Spain with his half-brother Duncan from as far as Scotland in 1190, to follow the Way of Compostela and then figth the Moors; in his sepulchre and the one of his wife, Eleonor de Cabrera, one can still see the scallop shell which is St. James emblem, commonly know as the vieira of Santiago along the Galician coast.

And so the Jacobean road became a real riverbed of the European cultural current which came to fertilize Spain and take back the profound militant faith of the land.

The original road to Santiago led through the pass at Roncesvalles, via Pamplona and Asturias to Galicia. In the late 11th Century, the main route was moved farther south via Burgos, thus indicating the Christian expansion. At this time there were four roads in France: Paris, Vezelay, Puy and Arles, known as Via Tolosana, Via Podiensis, Via Lemosina, and Via Turonensis. They connected with other pilgrims’ roads coming from England, Scandinavia, Germany, Hungary and Italy. The three French northern routes came together at San Juan de Pie de Puerto, a French city, founded by King García Ximénez of Navarra in 716, and given to the French under Louis XIV. Once crossed the Pyrenees, one found himself in Roncesvalles, the first Spanish city of the road. The road coming from Arles would join the others after Jaca, in Puente la Reina, and together through Logroño, Burgos and León to Santiago. Different languages, different nationalities, but a common faith, one common goal, to arrive at Santiago and sing the Pilgrims’ Song of Ultreya!

Significance

Non s’intende peregrino se non chi va verso la casa di Sa’ Iacopo. Dante Alighieri, homesick and in exile, was the first universal writer to define the world pilgrim. In the Vita Nuova (XL, Commentary on sonnet XXII), he tells us that nobody is a true pilgrim unless he is journeying towards "the house of St. James."

Following the example of the old pilgrims, he that embarks seriously in the Way of Compostela, to be a guest in the house of James, throws himself into an adventurous voyage of faith, of grace, of penance, of fraternal charity and constant prayer.

The ancients were terrified by the finis terrae, where the sun god went to die every day in his tomb of the Atlantic. And yet, following the signs in heaven, they were guided by the stars of the Milky Way towards the Campus Stellae, the field of the star. The Son of Thunder, apostle of the Man-God, attracts to that very same spot millions of souls in search for the divine, showing them the answer: Jesus Christ, and Jesus Christ through Mary, living pillar of our Faith.

The Way of Compostela reminds the pilgrim of today that a tired and discouraged apostle wept on his own way, having apparently failed in his mission. But now, Sidus refulgens, Jakob Boanerges is the resplendent star pointing the Way to Jesus through Mary. Is there a better reason to make the pilgrimage in our times?

Indulgences

Pope Calixtus II, great pilgrim and devoted client of Santiago, declared the pilgrimage to Compostela a "major" one, with spiritual favours similar to those obtained by the pilgrims to Rome and Jerusalem, adding the extraordinary concession of Jubilaeum Plenissimum Anni Sancti like the Holy Year in Rome. The privilege was confirmed again by Popes Eugenius III and Anastasius IV.

Pope Alexander III in his Bull Regis Aeterni, June 25, 1179, declared the privilege to be a perpetual one. Pope Paul VI, on March 1975, proclaimed the same Jubilaeum Plenissimum in perpetuity, answering to those who pretended it had been abrogated by the new laws concerning the Indulgences.

The Holy Year starts on December 31 and closes one year later, along with the Puerta Santa, the holy door by the apse of the Apostolic basilica.

This is the privilege accorded by the popes to the pilgrims:

• Holy Years are the ones in which the 25 of July falls on a Sunday
• In order to gain the jubilee one must:

1. Visit during the Holy Year the Apostolic basilica of St. James of Compostela,
2. Pray for the intentions of the Holy Father (at least one Credo and one Our Father),
3. Receive the sacraments of Confession and Communion within the period between fifteen days before and after the visit to Compostela.

• The grace of the jubilee is a Plenary Indulgence which remits the temporal punishment due for all sins.

All pilgrims who have walked for at least 100 kilometres of the Way of Santiago, or who have travelled at least 200 kilometres on horseback or bike riding, and who can accredit their journey with documentation sealed in the parishes and designated posts along the way (the credencial del peregrino), are eligible to receive the Compostelana, a beautiful document in Latin issued by the Chapter of the basilica, authentic testimonial of having visited Santiago as a true pilgrim.
It is traditional as well to enter the Holy Door, signifying the desire to receive God’s forgiveness; to embrace the statue of the apostle up in the main altar, accepting the Faith that he preached; and to visit the Apostolic sepulchre in the crypt to ask for special graces by the intercession of St. James.

Some visitors insist as well on touching the column in the Pórtico de la Gloria carved with the genealogy of Our Lord, and on putting their heads against the stone one of the santo dos croques, a small statue which probably represents Maestro Mateo, the genial sculptor of the Pórtico.

4. Compostelan Holy Year ...

Ultreya!

And we will sing at the Pórtico de la Gloria the Ultreya of the Codex Callixtinus, echoing in every accent the old cry of Compostela: Onward! Keep on going! For God and the great St. James!
Herru Sanctiagu

Grot Sanctiagu,

E ultreja e sus eja!

Deus adjuva nos!
[Father Ramón Anglés, of the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X, wrote this extensive article for the last Holy Compostelan Year, 2004; we publish it in this Holy Year of 2010 - the next one will be 2021! - and hope that it will provide spiritual profit to all our readers. May you all have a happy Feast of Saint James!]

Scandal in the Diocese of... ROME

[Warning: Unpleasant]

From the Daily Mail:
Catholic sex scandal as undercover reporter 'films priests at gay clubs and having casual flings'

A gay priest sex scandal has rocked the Catholic Church in Italy today after a weekly news magazine released details of a shock investigation it had carried out.

Using hidden cameras, a journalist from Panorama magazine - owned by Italian Prime Minister and media baron Silvio Berlusconi - filmed three priests as they attended gay nightspots and had casual sex.

Today there was no immediate comment from the Italian Bishops Conference and the Vatican - which has been rocked by a series of sex scandals involving paedophile priests since the start of the year.
The Vicariate of Rome has responded:
The Vicar of Rome today called on homosexual clergymen in the Catholic Church to “come out” and leave the priesthood. ... “No one is forcing them to stay in the priesthood to exploit the benefits,” the Diocese of Rome said in a statement posted on its Web Site. “If they are coherent, they should come out into the open.”
The whole shocking Panorama article is available in Italian here (PDF). The main character seems to have easy access to the innermost circles of the Holy See.

New Belgian bishops' spokesman argues same-sex 'marriage,' women priests

André Bishop Joseph Leonard and the Episcopal Conference of Belgium has appointed Jürgen Mettepenningen as their spokesman, effective August 1, according to Osservatore Vaticano.

Mettepenningen, who has earned a doctorate in theology from the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Catholic University of Leuven), has written in a published book that:

1. The Church has opened the priesthood to women; 2. The Church must recognize same-sex "marriage" and is currently discriminating against them by not recognizing it; and 3. "Considering that the phrases used during the celebration of the Eucharist must be refreshed, he justifies this position by the fact that we cannot, in his words, 'preach a message of life in a dead language.'"

How far must Belgian Church fall to hit rock bottom? (Please remember to follow @RorateCaeli on Twitter)

New chapter in Thiberville affair

For background, read our previous post.

From the website of the "Support Committee of Father Michel":
The Catholic faithful of the parish of Thiberville fully rejoice to learn that the highest court of the Holy See, the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, entitled Father F. Michel, Parish Priest of Thiberville, to explain, at length, his claims, by accepting the appeal that he had presented.

Contrary to public assertions by Bishop C. Nourrichard [Bishop of Évreux], no final decision has been reached by Roman authorities, currently examining several other matters.
The current Prefect of Apostolic Signatura is Archbishop Burke, Emeritus of Saint Louis (USA).

May Saint Louis, King of France, intercede before God for all faithful Catholics in Thiberville and in all of Normandy. [In the image, Saint-Louis, roi de France, of the collection of the Musée Louis-Philippe, in Eu, Haute-Normandie.]

Because they have been so absent from European politics
in the past 200 years...

EU to hold atheist and freemason summit

Brussels is to hold an EU summit with atheists and freemasons in the autumn, inviting them to a political dialogue parallel to the annual summit the bloc holds with Europe's religious leaders.

While the EU is a secular body, the three European presidents, of the commission, parliament and EU Council, alongside two commissioners, on Monday met with 24 bishops, chief rabbis, and muftis as well as leaders from the Hindu and Sikh communities. The annual dialogue, which has taken place since 2005, is for the first time this year made legally obligatory under Article 17 of the Lisbon Treaty.

Under pressure from Belgium, which constitutionally protects and financially supports humanist organisations as well as churches, the EU has been forced to hold a mirror-image summit, but of atheists, scheduled for 15 October.

However, in a move that perplexed and annoyed humanist groups, the EU atheist summit will also welcome under the rubric of ‘non-religious groups', the Freemasons, the secretive fraternal organisation, according to commission spokeswoman Katharina von Schnurbein.

Centennial
Notre Charge Apostolique
I - What was the Sillon?

In another step of our celebration of the centennial of the epic orthodox struggle of Pope Saint Pius X, we now begin a month of commemoration of the 100th anniversary of one of his most incisive documents, the Encyclical Letter Notre Charge Apostolique, signed on August 25, 1910.

Pope Sarto sent this letter, filled with lessons to all Catholics of our age, to the Bishops of France, dealing with a particularly insidious movement, the Sillon. The Pope was here dealing not with the abstract notion of Modernism and of "the Modernist", as he had done in Pascendi, but with a very practical problem: a Modernist movement, growing within the Church in France, disguised in the most attractive manner, and with the most dangerous intentions.

What was the Sillon? The Catholic Encyclopedia explains its idealist origins and its first years, as part of the movement of Catholic Congresses:

About the close of the nineteenth century Marc Sangnier and some of his friends founded the society called the "Sillon" (the Furrow). Convinced that in future democracy, which they took as their ideal, would rule the State and society, and desiring to prevent its degeneration under bad and godless leaders, while hoping to keep it from turning against the Church, these young men resolved to build up a democratic constituency of high-minded Christians devoted to the Church and well-informed on political and social questions. The idealism characteristic of the "Sillon" has gained for it the respect of the working-classes. In the beginning the tendencies of the society were not clear, as was shown in the first four general meetings: Paris, 1902; Tours, 1903; Lyons, 1904; Paris, 1905. More definiteness of plan was evident at the later gatherings, Paris, 1906; Orléans, 1907; and especially at Paris, 1908, giving promise that the "Sillon" would develop into a socio-political party taking an active part in national politics. This explains why it asserted its independence of the bishops and intention always to support any political measure that may aid in improving the condition of the working-classes, and especially all efforts aiming at thorough social regeneration and a genuinely democratic form of society and government. Only in this way, it is held, will the workman be able to obtain an equal share of the material, intellectual, and moral possessions belonging to the whole nation. Collectivism is absolutely rejected by the association. The growth of the "Sillon" into an independent socio-political party, its refusal to be "avant tout catholique" [Catholic in the first place] aroused the distrust of some of the bishops. Consequently the clergy held back from it. Nevertheless, the membership did not fall off. The first congress represented 45 members; the second, 300; the third, 800; the fourth, 1100; the fifth, 1500; the sixth, 1896. The "Fédération gymnastique et sportive des patronages catholiquesde France" intended to aid all Catholic societies in honour of a local saint by arranging sports for the members of the patronage has held annual meetings since 1898 when the federation began in a union of 13 patronages; the number is now 450, representing 50,000 young people in all parts of France.
It was, therefore, a full part of the general ralliement, encouraged by Pope Leo XIII, which was met, not with Republican openness, but with an all-out attack on the Church which would ultimately lead to the Law of 1905. Pope Saint Pius X recalled:

This[the foundation of the movement] was shortly after Our Predecessor Leo XIII of happy memory had issued his remarkable Encyclical on the condition of the working class [Rerum Novarum]. Speaking through her supreme leader, the Church had just poured out of the tenderness of her motherly love over the humble and the lowly, and it looked as though she was calling out for an ever growing number of people to labor for the restoration of order and justice in our uneasy society.

Was it not opportune, then, for the leaders of the Sillon to come forward and place at the service of the Church their troops of young believers who could fulfill her wishes and her hopes? And, in fact, the Sillon did raise among the workers the standard of Jesus Christ, the symbol of salvation for peoples and nations. Nourishing its social action at the fountain of divine grace, it did impose a respect for religion upon the least willing groups, accustoming the ignorant and the impious to hearing the Word of God. And, not seldom, during public debates, stung by a question, or sarcasm, you saw them jumping to their feet and proudly proclaiming their faith in the face of a hostile audience. This was the heyday of the Sillon; its brighter side accounts for the encouragement, and tokens of approval, which the bishops and the Holy See gave liberally when this religious fervor was still obscuring the true nature of the Sillonist movement.
[To be continued.]

Return to Dominican tradition in Washington, D.C.

Content removed due to a request of an authority of the Friars Preachers.

Why have "I Can't Believe It's Not Butter"
when you are able to eat REAL BUTTER?

A report on the decline of the New Mass in Latin in the United States,
by Peter Karl T. Perkins:

Since 2005, the number of every-Sunday New Masses in Latin in the U.S.A. has fallen from 58 to 39. The number of dioceses in the U.S.A. offering this Mass every Sunday has fallen from 36 to 28.

At present, the ratio of T.L.M.s to N.O.M.s in Latin is 9:1. The ratio of dioceses offering the two Masses is 5:1. My conclusion is that the N.O.M. in Latin is a dead duck. It is dying fast (but quietly). Bad news for the Adoremus movement, Frs. Harrison and Fessio, and the Hitchcocks. They hitched themselves to the wrong waggon. Fessio displeased the Pizza king in Florida (Ave Maria U.) and is now more or less nowhere. Harrison has been busy trying to square the circle by explaning how Dignitatis Humanæ is compatible with Quanta Cura and the Syllabus of Errors of 1864. Good luck to him on that. I'm planning on climbing Mt. Everest next year.

If we examine more closely where the Latin N.O.M. is offered, we can see that this fake substitute that has no place in the ancient patrimoney of Holy Church was and is being used to 'shut out' the real thing. For example, Cardinal Baloney of Los Angeles tried to arrange Latin N.O.s to lure people away from the real thing. But while some of these persist, there are now more T.L.M.s in his Archdiocese than N.O.M.s in Latin. Come February of next year, this bad man will be gone (and preferably in prison). He has failed in his endeavour to stamp out tradition, just as he's failed to stamp out truth.

Another place where Latin N.O.s abound is the Archdiocese of Detroit. The former Archbishop, Adam Cardinal Maida, pulled out all the stops in the 1990s to prevent celebration of the T.L.M. One method was to offer the N.O.M. in Latin as a sung Mass with beautiful music and a traditional setting. It didn't work. Local traditionalists drove to the Diocese of Lansing to refuse him, some went to the many Eastern Divine Liturgies in Detroit, and some crossed the Canadian border, where a traditionalist priest of the Diocese of London put a Sunday T.L.M. right on the other side of the bridge in Windsor! Of course, there were those who were fooled by Maida. Happily, he has now passed the age of 80 and will therefore not be able to poison the next conclave. Meanwhile, his every-Sunday Latin N.O. Masses are now down to 3. Meanwhile, the T.L.M. has arrived in force under the new Archbishop. Under Maida, there were 0 and finally 1 of these every Sunday. Now there are five.

The problem persists in Las Vegas, where Bishop Pepe uses every trick in the book to keep our Mass out of his diocese, at least on Sundays. But he has THREE every-Sunday N.O.M.s in Latin. This is a man who cannot see the writing on the wall, or who just doesn't care what it says. No one can force him to read it.

There were once many N.O.s in Latin in the A. of San Francisco. Now there is only one, and the T.L.M. is also available every Sunday--now that Levada is gone. Levada was not so bad in terms of his views. The problem was that he was too chicken to stand up to the apparatchiks in his diocesan curia.

There were once numerous every-Sunday T.L.M.s in the Diocese of Arlington, in Virginia, under that Bishop who died of a heart attack while waiting to see the Pope in Rome (forgotten his name now). Under his successor we see a reversal: the Latin N.O.M.s are down to one per Sunday and the T.L.M.s have essentially replaced their rivals. It's all over.

The present Bishop of Orange continues to have two every-Sunday N.O.M.s in Latin but has not forbidden our Mass and we now have four of them every Sunday--twice as many.

The A. of St. Paul & Minneapolis still has two every-Su. N.O.M.s in Latin, a hold-over from the endless years in which the State fo Minnesota was a black hole for tradition.

Las Vegas is the only Diocese in the U.S.A. that has the Latin N.O.M. every Sunday but not one T.L.M. approved by the diocese. The S.S.P.X is present there; so is an independent priest. Las Vegas also has the distinction of being BY FAR the most populous U.S. see not having our Mass on the every-Sunday basis. Really, someone from Rome needs to have a little talk with Bishop Pepe.

Ordinations


Cardinal Canizares Llovera sent a letter to the Superior of the Institute of the Good Shepherd, apologizing for not being able to lead the Ordinations of July 10, 2010, but vowing to visit the Bordeaux main house of the Institute soon.

You can find pictures of the Ordinations here. (Tip: FC)

Good Queen Mary

Proclaimed: 19 Iulii MDLIII
A Queen filled with love

The use of the rod can actually be a service of love. Today we can see that it has nothing to do with love when conduct unworthy of the priestly life is tolerated. Nor does it have to do with love if heresy is allowed to spread and the faith twisted and chipped away, as if it were something that we ourselves had invented. As if it were no longer God’s gift, the precious pearl which we cannot let be taken from us.
Benedict XVI
June 11, 2010

Fifteenth Annual Pilgrimage for Restoration

Reparation for sin.
Restoration
by grace.
Reform
of life.


Join the 15th annual "Pilgrimage for Restoration" to the Shrine of Our Lady of the North American Martyrs, Auriesville, New York.

September 22 - 25, 2010

Check it out at www.national-coalition.org/pilgrim/.

Walk, sing, pray along the paths, the actual places where the North American Saints lived and died for Christ, for their persecutors, and for you.

Join one day or four, for 7 miles or 70. Transportation for weary pilgrims provided throughout.

'Modified pilgrimage' for parents with young children, and for seniors.

Traditional Roman Mass (forma extraordinaria) and confessions daily. Plenary indulgence.

For more info, including a schedule of events, send your postal address to lloydg@national-coalition.org.

Register online at http://www.national-coalition.org/pilgrim/registration.html.

Request prayers or sponsor pilgrims at www.national-coalition.org/pilgrim/PilgwoTrvl.html.

Inquiries? Call the National Coalition 610/435-2634, or e-mail Pilgrimage Director lloydg@national-coalition.org.

Looking for spiritual adventure, heroic challenge, Catholic fellowship? Bring the family, come with friends. Join Catholics from all over North America and beyond.

Pass this info along.

www.national-coalition.org

lloydg@national-coalition.org



610/435-2634 tel

National Coalition of Clergy & Laity
621 Jordan Circle
Whitehall, PA 18052-7119 USA


***

More information can be found on the blog of Br. Andre-Marie MICM:

The Pilgrimage for Restoration

Auriesville Pilgrimage is about the Conversion of America

For our edification

Video with pictures of the exhumation this year of the incorrupt body of Stephen Nehme (1889 - 1938), a Maronite lay brother who was beatified on June 27, 2010:



Another video can be found here.

The lesson of the Dishonest Steward

Et laudavit dominus villicum iniquitatis, quia prudenter fecisset: quia filii hujus saeculi prudentiores filiis lucis in generatione sua sunt. (From the Gospel for the Eighth Sunday after Pentecost, St. Luke xvi, 8: "And the master commended the unjust steward, forasmuch as he had done wisely: for the children of this world are wiser in their generation than the children of light.")
______________________________

Today (...), through a parable that inspires in us a certain surprise since it speaks of a dishonest steward who is praised (cf. Lk 16: 1-13), a close look reveals that here the Lord has reserved a serious and particularly salutary teaching for us.
As always, the Lord draws inspiration from the events of daily life: he tells of a steward who is on the point of being dismissed for dishonest management of his master's affairs and who, to assure a future for himself, cunningly seeks to come to an arrangement with his master's debtors. He is undoubtedly dishonest but clever: the Gospel does not present him to us as a model to follow in his dishonesty, but rather as an example to be imitated for his farsighted guile. The short parable ends, in fact, with these words: "The master commended the dishonest steward for his prudence" (Lk 16: 8).

But what does Jesus wish to tell us with this parable? And with its surprising conclusion? The Evangelist follows the parable of the dishonest steward with a short series of sayings and recommendations on the relationship we must have with money and the goods of this earth. These short sentences are an invitation to a choice that presupposes a radical decision, a constant inner tension. Life is truly always a choice: between honesty and dishonesty, between fidelity and infidelity, between selfishness and altruism, between good and evil. The conclusion of this Gospel passage is incisive and peremptory: "No servant can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other".

Ultimately, Jesus says, "You cannot serve God and mammon" (Lk 16: 13). Mammon is a term of Phoenician origin that calls to mind economic security and success in business; we might say that riches are shown as the idol to which everything is sacrificed in order to attain one's own material success; hence, this economic success becomes a person's true god. As a result, it is necessary to make a fundamental decision between God and mammon, it is necessary to choose between the logic of profit as the ultimate criterion for our action, and the logic of sharing and solidarity. ...

Basically, it is a matter of choosing between selfishness and love, between justice and dishonesty and ultimately, between God and Satan. If loving Christ and one's brethren is not to be considered as something incidental and superficial but, rather, the true and ultimate purpose of our whole existence, it will be necessary to know how to make basic choices, to be prepared to make radical renouncements, if necessary even to the point of martyrdom. Today, as yesterday, Christian life demands the courage to go against the tide, to love like Jesus, who even went so far as to sacrifice himself on the Cross.
Benedict XVI
Homily
September 23, 2007