During the first few weeks of the COVID lockdowns in the U.S. you may recall an excellent guest op-ed by a priest of the Diocese of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. A half year later, with lockdowns -- or at least partial lockdowns -- still in place in many locations, we bring to you a follow-up piece by Father Naugle:
***
Social Justice of Lockdowns, Continued
By the Rev. Fr. John F. Naugle, M.A., S.T.B.
On April 20, my op-ed “The Ends Never Justify the Means: The
Immorality of Indefinite Lockdowns" appeared on this web log as an attempt
to trigger a much needed discussion about what the Church’s social doctrine has
to say regarding the rights of laborers and how the indefinite lockdowns
imposed by civil rulers represented an intrinsically evil course of action that
could never be justified. It had been my hope that, as a result of this
discussion, the Church’s sacred pastors would be roused from hiding in their
residences to boldly defend the God-given right to earn bread for one’s family.
 |
The basilica shrine in Washington, DC -- the largest church in North America --
still has a maximum legal capacity of 100 people.
|
Days and weeks went by. In the meantime, our malefactors in government and the
media have implicitly admitted that they have no intention of returning our
rights to us. Instead they have instructed us to completely forget our former
lives and instead embrace the Orwellian “new normal.” My own governor, Tom
Wolf, shockingly denied in federal court the existence of “any fundamental
right to earn a living.” As I was beginning to despair that perhaps nobody else
was willing to address the sinful economic damage being done to the working
class, I came across these words in an interview published in an online
magazine: “Yes, I think the lockdown is the worst assault on the working class
in half a century, and especially on the urban working class.”
There was only one problem. I was not reading these words in a pastoral letter
from a bishop. I was not reading these words in a Catholic journal. I was
reading these words from a socialist magazine named in honor of the French
Revolution political movement responsible for the Reign of Terror. The thought
of socialists being bold enough to oppose what we have become accomplices in
through silence and consent immediately turned my mind to God’s terrible
judgement.
The Church, in her repeated condemnation of all forms of socialism, has always
put forth that it is the Bride of Christ who is actually the lover and defender
of the worker and not the socialist revolutionary. Her importance in the simultaneous fight
against the evils of the Industrial Revolution on one side and the evils of socialist
revolution on the other was cemented by the fact that her shepherds and her
sheep were on the picket lines and also exerting their political will to bring
worldly power into obedience to social doctrine. Indeed, beginning with Leo
XIII, the assertion of a social doctrine was rightly understood to be a
reclaiming of a “cross over crown” understanding of the relationship between
the Church and the state. The Church has the right and obligation to pronounce
moral judgement over nations in defense of the fundamental rights of man as
contained in Divine Law. This claim can in no way be written off as belonging a
pre-modern set of circumstances. We find it even in Gaudium et Spes: “It
is only right, however, that at all times and in all places, the Church should
have true freedom to preach the faith, to teach her social doctrine, to
exercise her role freely among men, and also to pass moral judgment in those
matters which regard public order when the fundamental rights of a person or
the salvation of souls require it” (GS 76). As we now are over 200 days
into “15 Days to Slow the Spread,” where are the ecclesial condemnations of the
lies we have been told? Where are the reproaches of the so-called “experts” whose
predictions of doom have made the false prophets of Israel look reliable by
comparison? Where are the decrees that our leaders have wickedly imposed
restrictions forbidden by Natural Law and therefore the faithful are not
obliged to obey them.
