Roberto de Mattei
Corrispondenza Romana
June 21, 2018
The Holy Eucharist has always been the choice target
of those who hate the Church. The Holy Eucharist, in fact, sums up the Church.
As a Passionist theologian notes, the Eucharist “epitomizes all the revealed
truths; it is the exclusive source of grace: it is the anticipation of bliss,
the sum of all the wonders of the Almighty.” (Enrico Zoffoli, Eucarestia o nulla, [The Eucharist or
Nothing] Edizioni Segno, Udine 1994, p. 70).
The present attacks on the Sacrament of the Eucharist
were predicted by Our Lady of Fatima in 1917. At the Cova da Iria, the Virgin
exhorted the three little shepherds to pray to “[…]Jesus Christ, present in all the tabernacles of the
world, in reparation for the outrages, sacrileges, and indifferences whereby He
is offended.” And even before, in the spring of 1916, the Angel had appeared to
the children holding a chalice in his hand, above which a Host hung in the air.
He gave the Sacred Host to Lucia, and the Blood from the Chalice to Jacinta and
Francesco, who remained on their knees, while he said: “Take and drink the Body
and Blood of Jesus Christ, horribly insulted by ungrateful men. Make reparation
for their crimes and console your God.”
Cardinal Robert Sarah, Prefect for the Congregation of Divine Worship,
in the preface to Don Federico Bortoli’s fine book- Communion in the Hand. Historical, Juridical and Pastoral Profiles
(Cantagalli, Siena 2017), asserts that this backdrop “shows us how we
must receive the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ.”
According to the Cardinal, “the outrages that Jesus receives in the
Sacred Host” are first of all “the horrible profanations, which some former-Satanists
(now converted) gave horrifying
descriptions of”; but also “sacrilegious Communions, received when not in a
state of grace, or not professing the Catholic faith”. Moreover “All that might impede the fruitfulness
of the Sacrament, above all, the errors sown in the minds of the faithful as
they no longer believe in the Eucharist”.
But the most insidious diabolical attack consists “in attempting to
extinguish the faith in the Eucharist, by sowing errors and favoring an
unbecoming way of receiving Communion; truly the war between Michael and his
Angels on one side, and Lucifer on the other, continues in the hearts of the
faithful: Satan’s target is the Sacrifice of the Mass and the true Presence of
Jesus in the Consecrated Host”. This attack follows two lines: the first is “the
reduction of the concept of the ‘Real Presence’, with the neutralizing of the term “transubstantiation”.
The second is “the attempt to remove from the hearts
of the faithful the sense of the sacred”. Cardinal Sarah writes: “While the
term “transubstantiation” points to the Real Presence, the sense of the
sacred helps us catch a glimpse of the absolute distinctiveness and holiness of
the Sacred Host. What wretchedness it would be to lose the sense of the sacred
in that which is precisely the most sacred! And how is it possible? By receiving
the special food in the same way as ordinary food.”
He then gives a warning: “May no priest dare to impose
his own authority on this matter by refusing or maltreating those who wish to
receive Holy Communion on their knees and on the tongue: we come as children
and we humbly receive the Body of Christ kneeling and on the tongue.”
Cardinal
Sarah’s observations are more than right, but must be placed into a process of
secularization of the liturgy which has its origins in the ambiguous Novus Ordo Missae of Paul VI (April 3,
1969) which next year sees its ominous fiftieth anniversary. This liturgical
reform, as Cardinals Ottaviani and Bacci had written when presenting their Brief Critical Study, represented “both as a whole and in its details, a
striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as it was formulated
in Session XXII of the Council of Trent.”
A new theology of the Mass replaced the traditional one, the notion of
sacrifice was removed and faith in the Eucharist, in praxis, was undermined.
On the other hand, the opening to the divorced and
remarried, encouraged by the Exhortation Amoris
laetitia, and inter-communion with the Protestants, wished for by many
bishops – what are these but outrages to
the Eucharist? The Bolognese priest Don Alfredo Morselli has illustrated well
the theological roots that link Amoris
laetitia and intercommunion with the Evangelicals.*
Let us also say that the attack on the Eucharist has today become
an attack on Holy Orders, because of the close link that unites the two Sacraments.
The visible constitution of the Church is founded on Holy Orders, the Sacrament
that renders the baptized participant in the Priesthood of Christ; the priesthood
is principally exercised in the offering of the Eucharistic Sacrifice which
requires the miracle of transubstantiation, the central dogma of the Catholic
faith.
If the presence of Christ in the Tabernacle is not real
and substantial and the Mass is reduced to a mere memorial, or symbol, of what
happened at Calvary, there is no need for priests who offer the sacrifice and
since the hierarchy in the Church is founded on the priesthood, the
constitution of the Church and Her Magisterium are annulled. In this sense the admittance of the divorced/remarried
and the Protestants to the Eucharist is linked to the prospect of assigning the
priesthood to married lay-people and conferring the minor holy orders to women. The attack on the
Eucharist is an attack on the priesthood.
There is nothing greater, more beautiful, more
touching than the mercy of God towards the sinner. That Heart which has so
loved mankind, by the intercession of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, to which He
is inseparably bound, wants us to enjoy eternal happiness in Heaven and nobody,
not even the most hardened sinner, can doubt this redeeming love. For this
reason we must never lose trust in God, but conserve this until the end of our
lives, as no-one has ever been deceived by this ardent trust. Our Lord does not deceive us, but we can try to deceive Him and ourselves. And
there is no greater deceit in making believe that it’s possible to be saved
without repenting of our sins and without professing the Catholic faith.
Those who sin or live in sin, if they
repent, will be saved; but if they presume to deceive God, they will not be
saved. It is not God that condemns them, but themselves, as, by approaching the
Sacraments unworthily, they eat and drink their own condemnation. It is St. Paul who explains this to the
Corinthians, with these grave words: “Therefore whosoever shall eat this
bread, or drink the
chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the
Lord. But let a man prove himself: and so let him eat of that bread,
and drink of the chalice. For
he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh judgment to
himself, not discerning the body of the Lord.” (1 Cor. 11,
27-29). St Paul noted then that, in the Corinthian Church, as a result of
sacrilegious Communions, there were many cases of people who mysteriously
became ill and died. (1Cor. 11,30).
Sad is the fate of those who do not approach the Sacraments
because they persist in a life of sin. Worse is the destiny of those who approach
the Sacraments sacrilegiously, not being in a state of grace. Even graver is
the sin of those who encourage the faithful to receive Communion in a state of
sin and administer illicitly the Eucharist to them.
These are the outrages that wound and pierce most
deeply the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary. These are
the sins that demand our reparation, our presence in front of the Tabernacle
and our public defense of the Eucharist against all kinds of desecrators. Doing
thus, we will secure our salvation, that of our neighbor and accelerate the
coming of the Kingdom of Jesus and Mary in our societies, which will not take
long to establish itself upon the ruins of the modern world.
Translation: contributor Francesca Romana
