Rorate Caeli
Showing posts with label The Instruction:Comments. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Instruction:Comments. Show all posts

400th Anniversary of the Rituale Romanum
Apostolic Constitution Apostolicæ Sedi, of June 17, 1614



Paul V Borghese, the great pontiff whose name and surname lord over the façade of the Vatican Basilica and Saint Peter's Square, promulgated at the Liberian Basilica, exactly  400 years ago, on June 17, 1614, the last of the great books that form the basic liturgical texts of our Roman Rite.

In chronological order of publication, they are the following:

1568 - July 9 : Breviarum Romanum [Saint Pius V, Apostolic Constitution "Quod a Nobis]

1570 - July 14 : Missale Romanum [Saint Pius V, Apostolic Constitution "Quo primum tempore"]

1596 - February 10 : Pontificale Romanum [Clement VIII, Apostolic Constitution "Ex quo in Ecclesia Dei"]

1600 - July 14 : Cæremoniale Episcoporum [Clement VIII, Apostolic Constitution "Cum novissime"]

1614 - June 17 : Rituale Romanum [Paul V, Apostolic Constitution "Apostolicae Sedi"]

In all cases, let us remember that these were revised (in the case of most) or new books, as demanded by the Fathers of the Council of Trent, but their content was not new - they should rather be considered compilations of what the best liturgical experts of the time considered the purest and most venerable texts of the Rite. Their contents were in most cases indistinguishable from the best works preceding the great Council: there was never any question of mere invention, or pseudo-archaeological repristination, much less ideological considerations, other than the need to preserve, by authentic repristination, the utmost orthodoxy of the formulas following a century of religious upheaval in Europe.

The Ritual itself is the ultimate compilation: its purpose was to put together in a single volume all the Sacramental orders and other relevant blessings and services celebrated by a priest that are not included in the official texts present in the Missal or the Breviary - though it does include several also published there, being as it is the essential convenient reference book for priests. It is for that reason that it looks less precise than the other liturgical volumes, but that is an essential aspect of its variegated nature. And, indeed, it is for that reason that all priests used to have at least a miniature version of it almost always at hand - and traditional priests still do: one never knows when the Rituale will be needed.

For a final liturgical law note, remember that the entire traditional Roman Ritual, in its last editio typica (1952), as all liturgical books of the Roman Rite in place in 1962, is fully in force for use by all priests of the Latin Church (cf. Apostolic Letter Summorum Pontificum and its application Instruction Universae Ecclesiae, n. 35: "The use of the Pontificale Romanum, the Rituale Romanum, as well as the Cæremoniale Episcoporum in effect in 1962, is permitted, in keeping with n. 28 of this Instruction, and always respecting n. 31 of the same Instruction.") This must always remain the case: as Benedict XVI taught, truly ad perpetuam rei memoriam..., "What earlier generations held as sacred, remains sacred and great for us too, and it cannot be all of a sudden entirely forbidden or even considered harmful" - "it behooves all of us to preserve the riches which have developed in the Church’s faith and prayer, and to give them their proper place."

______________________________________

APOSTOLIC CONSTITUTION
"Apostolicæ Sedi"
OF POPE PAUL VI
on the Edition of the Roman Ritual


POPE PAUL V
ad perpetuam rei memoriam


Called by divine munificence, and not through any personal merit, to occupy the Apostolic See, we deem it our duty to watch with full earnestness over all that concerns the decorum of God's house. And such constant vigilance on our part prompts us to take suitable measures so that, as the Apostle admonishes, everything in divine worship may function decently and orderly. Particularly is this true in regard to the administration of the sacraments of the Church of God; here especially our office obliges us to provide that a religious observance be given those rites and ceremonies established by apostolic tradition and the decrees of the fathers. 

Pope Pius V, our saintly predecessor, fully conscious of his obligation which is now ours, labored with pastoral indefatigability to publish first the Roman Breviary, then the Roman Missal--both having been worked out with much labor and zealous care--so that there might be, God willing, a uniform manner of chanting and praying the Church's liturgy. He did this not only to restore careful observance of the sacred rites in celebrating the Holy Sacrifice and chanting the Divine Office, but also for the purpose of promoting the bond of Catholic unity in faith and in government, under the visible authority of the Roman Pontiff, the successor of St. Peter. 

With similar wisdom our predecessor of blessed memory, Clement VIII, followed in the footsteps of Pius V. He not only gave to the bishops and lesser prelates of the Church the carefully revised Pontifical; but he also made a systematic compilation of many other ceremonies wont to be used in cathedrals and lesser churches, embodied in the Ceremonial which he promulgated. With all this accomplished there remained to be published, by authority of the Holy See, a volume of the Ritual which would contain the genuine and sacred rites of the Catholic Church, those which must be observed by shepherds of souls in the administration of the sacraments and in other ecclesiastical functions. 

Amidst the numerous existing rituals it would rank as the official and authorized one, by whose standard the officiants could fulfill their priestly office unhesitatingly, and with uniformity and precision. This matter had been urged a long time ago. But since the work of the General Councils (whose acts by God's help have been published both in the Greek and Latin tongues) is at present hindered, we considered it our obligation to prosecute the business in right good earnest. 

In order that the task proceed correctly and orderly as it should, we assigned it to certain of our venerable brethren among the cardinals, outstanding for their piety, learning, and sagacity. Aided by the counsel of scholars and through comparison with ancient as well as other available rituals--in particular that erudite work of Julius Antonius of blessed memory, Cardinal with title of St. Severina, a man of singular piety, zeal, and learning--the commission of cardinals has succeeded in compiling a ritual of desired brevity, after mature deliberation and with the help of God. 

Now as we see lying before us this well-arranged assortment of received and approved rites of the Catholic Church, we deem it fitting that it be published for the universal utility of God's Church, under the title of "Roman Ritual." Therefore, we exhort in the Lord the venerable brothers patriarchs, archbishops, bishops, and their vicars, beloved sons of ours, as well as abbots, all pastors wherever they labor, and all others concerned, sons of the Roman Church, that in future they use during the sacred functions this Ritual, made official by the authority of the same Church, mother and mistress of all; and that in a matter so important as this they observe inviolately whatever the Catholic Church with her ancient and approved traditions has laid down.

Given at Rome, at St. Mary Major, under the fisherman's seal, on June 17, 1614, in the tenth year of Our Pontificate.


PAULUS PP. V

[Thanks to Schola Sainte-Cécile for the anniversary reminder; Sancta Missa for the translation above, slightly edited.]

The Mass of 1965: back to the future?
Why it is not an option

The Psalm Iudica (psalm 42): crossed out in 1965
One reason why many good-hearted people wanted a 'Reform of the Reform' is that some kind of reform was called for by the Second Vatican Council in Sacrosanctum Concilium ('SC'). Now that some of them have given up on the project of tinkering with the Novus Ordo, an alternative would seem to be going back to the 1962 Missal and using the Council's criteria to make the reform again. To undertake the Reform We Should Have Had. Fr Somerville-Knapmann suggests it might look like the transitional Missal of 1965. Fr Mark Kirby says very much the same thing with more detail.

The first thing to note is that this wasn't a new edition of the Missal, but just a set of provisional revisions made by the Instruction Inter Oecumenici. There was another lot in 1967, and then the new Missa Normativa came out in 1969. Inter Oecumenici says about itself that it authorizes or mandates that those measures that are practicable before revision of the liturgical books go into effect immediately.

Again:

Until reform of the entire Ordo Missae, the points that follow are to be observed: 

The "Vatican Ordo for the Extraordinary Form"

From Summorum Pontificum Observatus (original in French):



The Ecclesia Dei Commission has just had an Ordo divini offici recitandi sacrique peragendi published by the Libreria Editrice Vaticana, whose elaboration was directed by Monsignor Pozzo, Secretary of the Pontifical Commission.

This Ordo, composed entirely in Latin, includes, as all documents of this type, the indication of the Divine Office to be chanted or recited and of the Mass to be celebrated on each day of the year.
... 
This Ordo starts on the First Sunday of Advent 2011.* The calendar of the feasts of the Temporal and of the Sanctoral rigorously follows the one in use in 1962 (for example, and contrary to the usage in several traditional places of worship, it forbids the use the organ on the Sundays in Advent, with reference to the Instruction De Musica Sacra, of September 3, 1958). It is obviously a Roman Ordo, that does not indicate the "national" feasts ... . On the other hand, it mentions the possibility of the use of the preface of Advent that existed in 1962 in all Dioceses in France, but not [included] in the Roman Missal.... 

The [Vatican Ordo]** solves the mixed [liturgical-disciplinary] question of the double Communion that may happen on the night and on the day of Christmas and Easter, authorizing it, according to the prescriptions of 1964 (this double communion is, in any event, practiced without any problem in all Traditional chapels).*** Yet in a "rigorist" sense it also solves the question of the Friday abstinence, by following not the legislation in place in 1962 (abstinence on all Fridays, except those that coincide with Feasts of obligation). It follows the discipline of the new Code of Canon Law in its "rigorous" interpretation (abstinence on all Fridays, except those that coincidewith "one of the days marked as solemnity", that is, the feasts of I Class, such as Friday in the Easter Octave). Taking these exceptions into consideration, on all Fridays the [Vatican Ordo] indicates (in bold, so that it cannot be ignored by anyone): Abstinentia.****
...
For which, paradoxically, the [Vatican Ordo] is more rigorous and closer to the traditional discipline than... the Ordo used by the Society of Saint Pius X and edited by the Monastery of Saint-François du Trévoux, which makes mention of the obligation of abstinence only on Fridays in Lent .

Rorate notes:

* Kind of late, they should be releasing the 2012-2013 Ordo - actually they should not only release it, those responsible must stop with this nonsense and always also make available the whole Ordo online, as the monks of Le Barroux and the priests of the Apostolic Administration of Saint John Mary Vianney have already been doing in the past few years (see our sidebar). It is a public service and a work of charity. For those who are interested, it can be bought at Pax Book.

** The original post says "Pozzo Ordo" - a name which displays a servility with which we are sure the Pontifical Commission would not agree.

*** Not at all; double communion on Christmas and Easter is still avoided in numerous places.


**** Naturally, Canons 1251 and 1253 are still in full force. 

The Sacred Triduum

This Holy Week is the first one under the "Universae Ecclesiae" clarifications issued by the Vatican last April.

To that end, let us recall the instruction approved by Pope Benedict XVI concerning traditional Latin liturgies on Maundy Thursday, Good Friday and Holy Saturday:

"33. If there is a qualified priest, a coetus fidelium ('group of faithful'), which follows the older liturgical tradition, can also celebrate the Sacred Triduum in the forma extraordinaria. When there is no church or oratory designated exclusively for such celebrations, the parish priest or Ordinary, in agreement with the qualified priest, should find some arrangement favourable to the good of souls, not excluding the possibility of a repetition of the celebration of the Sacred Triduum in the same church."

In 2007, Summorum Pontificum caused widespread confusion, as it innocently clarified Sacred Triduum liturgies must be public (not private). Many took this to mean traditional Latin liturgies were prohibited during the Sacred Triduum.

Thanks to Universae Ecclesiae, there is not only explicit permission for Maundy Thursday, Good Friday and Holy Saturday liturgies using the 1962 (albeit, sadly, not prior) books, but there is even an above-and-beyond indult for those traditional Latin liturgies to be offered in the same church and on the same day as novus ordo services. All barriers have been removed. Let us thank the pope by attending these liturgies where offered.

Summorum Pontificum for pilgrims to the Holy Land; TLM forbidden in the regular parishes of the Latin Patriarchate

The Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem made public today a decree (original text: French) on the application of Summorum Pontificum in its jurisdiction:


DECREE No. 49/2011

On the use of the Liturgy
in the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite


To the Rev. Rectors of the Basilicas and Sanctuaries,

In the parishes and chaplaincies of the diocese of the Latin Patriarchate, the Eucharist is always celebrated according to the ordinary form of the Roman Missal approved by the servant of God Pope Paul VI (1970) and promulgated in its third edition by the Blessed Pope John Paul II (2000).

Considering the consistent number of basilicas and sanctuaries built on the holy places and open to the reception of pilgrims coming from the entire world, the celebration of the Eucharist according to the extraordinary form remains always exceptional. It is only allowed to the groups of pilgrims already used to its usage in their country. It is subjected to the norms contained in the Instruction of the application of the Apostolic Letter Summorum Pontificum (April 30, 2011), published by the Pontifical Commision Ecclesia Dei.

For the spiritual good of these pilgrims,

The Patriarch, FOUAD TWAL,

Diocesan Ordinary,

with the consent of his Episcopal Council,

orders that,

in the Basilicas and sanctuaries,


the norms contained in the instruction be observed, along with the following:

4 years on:
Extraordinary liabilities...

It is our duty to re-post this, by Father M. Brown:

Reports reach the Forest now and again about bishops and vocations directors quizzing seminarians about their interest in the Extraordinary Form. This could be a good thing: they might be ensuring that seminarians are at one with the mind of the Church about the Extraordinary Form which Universae Ecclesiae told us a few months ago:

6. The Roman Missal promulgated by Pope Paul VI and the last edition prepared under Pope John XXIII, are two forms of the Roman Liturgy, defined respectively as ordinaria and extraordinaria: they are two usages of the one Roman Rite, one alongside the other. Both are the expression of the same lex orandi of the Church. On account of its venerable and ancient use, the forma extraordinaria is to be maintained with appropriate honour.

Thus if bishops and vocations directors are expressing any concern regarding the Extraordinary Form and seminarians it would, one would think, be to ensure that all seminarians are at home in both forms of the Roman Rite and most importantly are taught how to celebrate and to love the EF.

Sadly this is not what one hears. Instead seminarians are quizzed about their interest in the Extraordinary Form in such a way as to make clear to them that any interest would be considered a problem and as they used to say in my time, `a formation issue`. This is outrageous given developments in recent years. Eventually this will change but until then it is sad that people who are only following the directives of the Holy See are made to suffer.

Martin Mosebach on Universae Ecclesiae and the Gregorian Rite

From the website of the Society of St. Hugh of Cluny:


The Church Must Endure this Anger
Freedom is restored to the Old Rite: Martin Mosebach on the recent papal letter on the Latin liturgy
By Paul Badde

(Die Welt, May 23, 2011)

Four years ago, Pope Benedict XVI, against the opposition of the great majority in the Catholic Church, restored the old Latin liturgy to equality with the new vernacular form of the celebration of the mass, which had been mandated since 1969. (The Latin liturgy substantially dates back to Gregory the Great (540-604) and was finally authoritatively fixed by the Council of Trent (1545-1563).) A week ago, the Vatican, in a papal letter, reaffirmed its determination of 2007 and clarified some disputed questions regarding its practical application. Martin Mosebach, the recipient of the Büchner prize, is one of the most fervent admirers and defenders of the old Liturgy.

Official communiqués on Universae Ecclesiae
3: Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X

2. International Una Voce Federation.
3. Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X [UPDATED: English version]

[Note: a very well-balanced commentary published by DICI today. On n. 19 of the Instruction, the Fraternity is quite clear, focusing on the recognition of the "prerogatives" of Papal primacy: according to the commentary, the words of n. 19 should not be understood as meant as if the Fraternity had been intended as one of those "groups". The commentary ends with an interesting note: the divergence that exists is rather between the traditional Mass and the new one than between the Holy See and the Fraternity.]

Commentary
on the Instruction Universae Ecclesiae

19-05-2011 [English translation by the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X - FSSPX/SSPX]

Fellay: "mixed feelings" about the Instruction

In an interview available at the website of the German District of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X (FSSPX /SSPX), its Superior General, Bishop Bernard Fellay, expresses "mixed feelings" about the Instruction Universae Ecclesiae - particularly about n. 19 and n. 31.

Official communiqués on Universae Ecclesiae
2: International Una Voce Federation and a history of the struggle

2. International Una Voce Federation:
FIUV Statement in Response to the Publication of Universae Ecclesiae.

The publication of the document Universae Ecclesiae on 13th May 2011 has generated much comment and been the subject of detailed analysis in the media. The International Federation Una Voce would like to present a different perspective on this document which it welcomes enthusiastically.

The Una Voce movement started in late 1964, before the end of the Second Vatican Council, to ensure the retention of the age-old Latin language for the celebration of the Holy Mass. National societies were formed and the International Federation Una Voce (FIUV) came into being formally in 1967.

Official communiqués on Universae Ecclesiae
The Latin Mass Society

We will update this post as more communiqués become available. You may also add other sources and links to our comments.
_________________________
1. The Latin Mass Society of England and Wales:


LATIN MASS SOCIETY WELCOMES THE ‘INSTRUCTION’ FROM THE PONTIFICAL COMMISSION ‘ECCLESIA DEI’ ON THE APPLICATION OF THE MOTU PROPRIO ‘SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM’

Blueprint for recourse to the PCED under Universae Ecclesiae

A wonderful tool provided by Saint Louis Catholic. We encourage our readers in non-English speaking nations to provide us with translations (they may also send them to us so that we may make them all available at one place).
BLUEPRINT
FOR HAVING RECOURSE TO THE PONTIFICAL COMMISSION ECCLESIA DEI
(Art. 10, §§ 1-2 Instr. Universae Ecclesiae)

The long-awaited instruction Universae Ecclesiae of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, approved by the Holy Father in forma communis on April 8, 2011, issued on April 30, 2011 by authority of the Commission’s President, William Cardinal Levada, and released by the Vatican this May 13, 2011, may be said, without shadow of a doubt, to be an incremental improvement in the Church’s discipline safeguarding the celebration of the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite. Cf. Pontificia Commissio Ecclesia Dei, Instr. Universae Ecclesiae (30 Aprilis 2011): diurnarium «L’Osservatore Romano», 14 Maii 2011, pp. 4-5.

Despite its many imperfections, the officials of the Pontifical Commission deserve great credit for their securing of the final text against powerful enemies of Tradition continuing to work against the Roman Pontiff in his efforts to protect that “precious treasure to be preserved” which is the Usus Antiquior of the Roman Rite (cf.Universae Ecclesiae, 8[a]).

Virtually untreated by all commenting on the new Instruction is the most important feature of the text, the juridical mechanism by which Catholics encountering stiff resistance to the application of Summorum Pontificum can receive help from the Holy See in overturning adverse decisions of an Ordinary forbidding celebration of the Extraordinary Form: the procedure known ashierarchical recourse (cf. cann. 1732-1739 of the Code of Canon Law).

The following “blueprint” attempts to fill in this lacuna, and present in layman’s terms essential elements of the canonical procedure enshrined in Art. 10, §§ 1-2 of the Instruction Universae Ecclesiae, in his attempt to compel an Ordinary to open the gates of the Sanctuary to the celebration of the Extraordinary Form.