Rorate Caeli

Sacra Liturgia Conference - Bp. Dominique Rey's introductory remarks

25 June 2013


Your Eminences, Your Excellencies, dear friends: -

It is my pleasure to welcome you to the Pontifical University Santa Croce for Sacra Liturgia 2013.

We have come together from more than 35 countries throughout the world. Welcome!


Our work has already begun with the solemn celebration of Vespers in the Basilica of St Apollinare.
This was a very deliberate act, because before we speak about the Sacred Liturgy we must be immersed in the liturgical life of the Church.
The reality of the liturgy, into which we are initiated at the moment of our Baptism, precedes any study of the liturgy.
To be liturgical comes first.
To talk about the liturgy comes second.

But it is important to talk about and study the question of the liturgy! Here, in the aula magna, we shall listen to the contributions of many experts and leaders in this field.
I am particularly grateful to Their Eminences Cardinals Ranjith and Burke, and to my brother bishops, for giving of their time to teach us. 
So too, I wish to thank their Eminences Cardinal Canizares and Brandmueller who will celebrate Holy Mass for us, and preach.
And I thank all our speakers, especially those who have travelled far, for coming to share their expertise and insights with us.

Sacra Liturgia 2013 was inspired by the liturgical teaching and example of His Holiness, Pope Benedict XVI.
Pope Benedict taught us the importance of the ars celebrandi, reminding us that “everything related to the Eucharist should be marked by beauty” (Sacramentum Caritatis n. 41).
He taught us that there needs to be no opposition between the older and newer forms of the Roman rite – that both have their rightful place in the Church of the New Evangelisation.
He taught us that within the embrace of Catholic unity, other liturgical traditions can be welcomed as “precious gifts” and “treasures to be shared” (cf. Anglicanorum Cœtibus, § 5, III); for that reason I am particularly delighted that the Ordinary of the Ordinariate of our Lady of Walsingham, Msgr Keith Newton, will be present with us.

I wish this conference to be a tribute to the liturgical vision and achievements of our beloved Emeritus Bishop of Rome, Benedict XVI: may God reward him for all he has given us and grant him health and long life!

Pope Benedict initiated the Year of Faith to commemorate the 50th Anniversary of the Second Vatican Council during which we are meeting.
Our Holy Father, Pope Francis, has continued this initiative.
From the outset it was my wish that we should meet here in Rome, during this Year of Faith, so as to be close to Peter, to manifest our communion with him, and to pray with him on the great feast of Saints Peter and Paul.
That we have the opportunity to do this with our new Holy Father is a providential blessing.

Fifty years ago, in June 1963, the first session of the Second Vatican Council had concluded.
Blessed John XXIII had just been succeeded by the Venerable Paul VI, who continued the work of the Council. It was Paul VI who promulgated its Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy, Sacrosanctum Concilium, on December 4th 1963, at the end of the Council’s second session.

Fifty years later we need to look again at Sacrosanctum Concilium.
The liturgical reform which followed the Constitution’s promulgation gave us much of value, especially in its promotion of participation in the liturgy.
But it also caused controversy, both in its official reforms, in its translation into the vernacular languages, and in its varied local implementations.

We need to recognise, as did Blessed John Paul II, that there have been both “lights” and “shadows” in the liturgical life of the Church in the past 50 years (cf.Ecclesia de Eucharistia, n. 10).
We need to celebrate the legitimate progress that has been made. We need to consider the lessons that the mistakes made during these fifty years teach us.
We need to look again at the liturgical Constitution and re-discover its true meaning. Perhaps we need to correct some practices or recover some things that we have lost through what Cardinal Ratzinger called a “reform of the reform”?
Perhaps there are areas in which that “mutual enrichment” spoken of by Benedict XVI is necessary?

Above all, we need to promote authentic liturgical renewal in all its Catholic richness and diversity.
We need to promote the Sacred Liturgy celebrated as the Church gives it to us, as the Fathers and Popes of the Second Vatican Council desired.

This must not be dismissed as a marginal concern.
The liturgy is not a peripheral matter for the Church. As Cardinal Ratzinger wrote in 1997: “the true celebration of the Sacred Liturgy is the centre of any renewal of the Church whatever.”[1]
And as Sacrosanctum Concilium teaches us, the Sacred Liturgy is the ‘culmen et fons,’ the source and the summit, of the life and mission of the whole Church (cf. n. 10).

My friends, the Sacred Liturgy is not a hobby for specialists.
It is central to all our endeavours as disciples of Jesus Christ.
This profound reality cannot be over emphasised.
We must recognise the primacy of grace in our Christian life and work, and we must respect the reality that in this life the optimal encounter with Christ is in the Sacred Liturgy.

As a bishop it is my duty to do all I can to promote the New Evangelisation initiated by Blessed John Paul II.
Here, I wish to say very clearly that the New Evangelisation must be founded on the faithful and fruitful celebration of the Sacred Liturgy as given to us by the Church in her tradition – Western and Eastern.

Why?
Because it is in the Sacred Liturgy that we encounter the saving action of Jesus Christ in his Church today in a manner in which we encounter it nowhere else.
In the liturgy Christ touches us, nourishes us and heals us.
He strengthens us and orders us with particular graces.
When we pray liturgically we do so in communion with the whole Church, present, absent, living or dead.
Yes, there are other good and valuable spiritual practices, but none enjoys the objectivity and singular efficacy of the Sacred Liturgy (cf. Sacrosanctum Concilium, n. 7).

The New Evangelisation is not an idea or a program: it is a demand that each of us comes to know the person of Christ more profoundly and, by doing so, become more able to lead others to him.
The only way to begin this is through the Sacred Liturgy, and if the liturgy is somehow not right, or I am not properly prepared, this encounter with Christ will be impeded, the New Evangelisation will suffer.

That is why our celebration of the liturgy is so important.
We must maximise, not limit, the action of Christ in the liturgy.
If I change or re-create the Church’s liturgy according to my own wishes or a subjective ideology, how can I be sure that what I am doing is truly His work?
Whereas, if I faithfully celebrate that which the Church has given to us – and celebrate it as beautifully as possible – I am assured that I am a servant of Christ’s action, a minister of His sacred mysteries, not an obstacle in his path (cf. Mt 16:23).
Each of us, ordained ministers, religious and lay men and women, are called to this fidelity and respect for Christ, for His Church and for her liturgical rites.

And that is why liturgical formation is crucial.
I must obtain ‘from within’ as it were, the conviction that Christ is indeed at work in the Church’s sacred rites.
I must immerse myself in this privileged dynamic and discover its ways. This will bring me to the person of Jesus Christ again and again.
And this will enable me to bring Christ to others.

Liturgical formation, liturgical celebration and the mission of the Church: all three are intrinsically related.
That is why we are here: to consider this relationship and to examine its meaning and importance for the Church at the beginning of the twenty-first century.
If we do this well, we will lay very sound foundations for the New Evangelisation indeed.

It would be impossible for Sacra Liturgia 2013 to take place without the support of many people.
I am grateful to the Rector of the beautiful Basilica of St Apollinare, Msgr Pedro Huidobro, for welcoming us.
I am profoundly grateful to our many sponsors for their material help: The Knights of Columbus, Ignatius Press, CIEL UK, Granda, The Cardinal Newman Society, Human Life International, De Montfort Music, Arte Poli, Una Voce International, Ars Sacra, La Nef, Libreria Leoniana, and Editions Artège.
For the welcome we have been given here at the Pontifical University Santa Croce and for the use of their excellent facilities, we are all indebted.
So too, I thank the team of organisers and volunteers who have done so much to prepare for this event.

My friends, we are here to listen, to learn and to share with others.
But we are also here to pray – here in the Basilica of S. Apollinare and also with Holy Father, Pope Francis, in St Peter’s Basilica on Saturday.
If we do all of these things well we shall come closer to Christ whom we worship in the Sacred Liturgy, and we shall be empowered to be become the evangelists our world so desperately needs.

May God bless our efforts!
Thank you.


[1] Cf. Roberto de Mattei, “Reflections on the Liturgical Reform” in A. Reid ed.,Looking Again at the Question of the Liturgy with Cardinal Ratzinger, 2003, pp. 130-144; p. 141.

13 comments:

Robbie said...

Will Cardinal Ranjith's comments be posted? I followed his speech through Twitter and his comments sounded wonderful.

Jeanne Holler said...

God help us all :
The Modern Church has nothing to offer me .
The watered down Church of Nice is in a sad state of affairs, that iw why I now embrace the Traditional Latin Mass with all its reverence and MAJESTY .
GOD ALONE and He is to be worshipped in solemn adoration.

yoink! said...

With all due respect Jeanne, what do you have to offer Her? The Church is the Church is the Church! It has always, unceasingly been a living faith...

Alan Aversa said...

@yoink!: It seems that by "Modern Church," Jeanne means "Conciliar Church" or "Vatican II Church" or "those in the Church infected by Modernism."

Matthew said...

His Excellency says:

"He (Benedict XVI) taught us that there needs to be no opposition between the older and newer forms of the Roman rite – that both have their rightful place in the Church of the New Evangelisation."

The Church of the New Evangelisation? No thanks, I'll take the Catholic Church.

"there needs to be no opposition?" Excellency, there is, and nothing you declare or say can change that fundamental fact. The one was born of a rejection of the other, in contradiction to the other. Nothing, even your most ardent wishful thinking, can change that.

Mike said...

@yoink
With respect, your remarks are rude, if not flimsy. "The church is the church is the church"…! C'mon.. Forgive me, but it seems to me you enjoy pursuing a pointless little fit about nothing from time to time, yoink, eh?…

Jeanne makes completely clear what she 'offers' when she says "God alone…is to be worshipped in solemn adoration." Not with a grossly inferior liturgy composed by a committee to please Protestants, not with personality-drunk jokester priests spewing nonsense from the pulpit, not with watered down half-truths, not with balloons, not with clowns and dancing and pets and modernist indoctrination, not with idle frivolity, and certainly not with spurious notions about "a living church".

I don't like arguing with other folks who comment on blog threads. I prefer to comment with respect and civility by stating my own hopefully useful views, not by questioning others' views and comments. Perhaps you might try that approach. Frankly, it's incredible to me that you can read this blog in a serious way, and manufacture a chant like "the church is the church is the church" as a means to offer only contempt toward other Catholics' contributions. I feel sorry when I see that. Just my opinion. Maybe you'll think about it.

Angelo said...

I pray that this very important meeting not end up as a mere sentimental self congragulatory freak let down. I hope that this meeting be a declaration of war against the heresy of modernism. I pray that Mueller learn something here. It would have been great if Pope Francis was present at this whole affair. Maybe he would see and learn what is in the hearts of Traditionalists. I trust Cardinals Ranjith and Burke will speak up and start some real debates. The Church is a mess and anyone who thinks otherwise should be asked to leave, as their presence would only hinder any true progress. By the way what happened to Christian unity? Why were the SSPX Bishops not invited? They after all are in the very heart of this matter. I fear their absence will only turn the whole affair to a "I'm okay, your okay, we are all okay", we have had enough of that type of silliness for 50 years. Its time that those present speak with the voice of Christ! Let all the silly talk of the past 50 years come to an end here and now. May they speak as men of Christ!

Alexander adulescens said...

"...not with personality-drunk jokester priests spewing nonsense from the pulpit, not with watered down half-truths, not with balloons, not with clowns and dancing and pets and modernist indoctrination, not with idle frivolity,. . ."

First, well written. Good prose.

But I think such conferences and the opinions of the men involved (Msgs Burke and Ranjith et al) are often misunderstood. Speaking frequently with a priest who went to the same school as them over the years - I have come to see clearly that the claim at work is that all such liturgical abuses as described by you are in fact aberrations from the Novus Ordo.

Now what I say next I say as a, young, man who attends either Latin Mass or Byzantine Rite (Slavonic). I hate the Novus Ordo as offered locally with a perfect hatred.

Now, the Novus Ordo - it is not going anywhere. And the argument goes that it is not responsible for the abuses of priests since the second Vatican council.

It is, it is said, a form of the Roman Rite formed from elements in some instances, it is alleged, more ancient than the Extraordinary Form. Taken mainly, they say, from older Latin Rites.

Those who commit them are responsible for the liturgical abuses - not the form of Rite. They not infrequently will draw on their long experience to give you examples of abuses not as wild and impious as those seen today but abuses all the same that were committed when the Extraordinary Form was exclusively used.

They also regularly complain about the translations. But overall no one of any position today thinks that the Novus Ordo is intrinsically heretical or irreverent. It's origin and sources are defended as having been in line with tradition. It has been a failure of implementation they insist.

If you are expecting more from Monsignors Burke or Ranjith or Bux than we received from Benedictus - you are mistaken.

The best course that can be hoped for in the nearer future is a Novus Ordo as it is celebrated in St. Peter's basilica. Latin Introit, Greek Kyrie, Latin Confiteor, Gloria, Credo, Sanctus, Agnus Dei and lectiones (or at least Gospel) with the rest in the vernacular, together with a regular Mass in the Extraordinary Form. And even this is much to hope for.

Or you join an FSSP parish or move to the Byzantine Rite - which actually could serve as something of a prototype for a Latin-vernacular Novus Ordo. In every Divine Liturgy I have attended, Catholic and Orthodox, vernacular has been used together with Slavonic.

Without direct Divine intervention - I honestly fear we shall never again see a united Church in the West praying one form of Rite with one holy, ancient tongue.

- adulescens

Long-Skirts said...

yoink! said...

"With all due respect Jeanne, what do you have to offer Her?"

We Catholic women give our wombs and the children we bear. Those who don't birthe physically can give spiritual children that they can pray for. Please Jeanne pray for my son who will be made a Deacon in the SSPX next year and my daughter who is a Novice in an Order associated with the SSPX and my other 8 children who hopefully will bear more Catholic souls! Our 10th grandchild is on his way!!

THE
LILY

(“The martyrs were bound, imprisoned, scourged, racked, burnt, rent, butchered – and they multiplied.” St. Augustine)

No burning tearing
Scourging skin
It’s psychological
All within.

No rotting flesh
Or putrid blood
It’s sterile clean
No rancid crud.

For butchered
Tortured bound up skins
Reveals the Truths
Of Bishops' sins.

They want it nice
They want it hushed
With veins of ice
Good souls are crushed.

The silent cold
Is better yet
Frozen solid
Can’t beget.

For martyred blood
Reveals the Church
Blind souls see Truth
And end their search.

“We can’t have that!”
The Bishops say,
“So let’s ignore…
They’ll go away.

Enlightened men
Don’t scourge the skin
Enlightened men
Keep blood within.”

But they forgot –
The woman bleeds
And monthly makes
A bed for seeds

Where nice and hushed
They’ll grow to men
And seize the oars
From wrists that bend…

On Peter’s Barque
Where blood still flows
From woman’s womb…
The Lily grows!

Bwangi Kilonzo said...

Benedix XVI threw a wrench into what had become a de facto dogma of nervous or do tyranny with its ruthless enforcers.

mjh said...

Good question Angelo. Why were the SSPX Bishops not invited?

Bwangi Kilonzo said...

mjh said"
Good question Angelo. Why were the SSPX Bishops not invited?
"

I am guessing its due to their irregular situation with Rome?


I am not pleased with SSPX, they are wasting their time in a tizzy while we need them in the regular church for the fight for souls. I understand it was necessary to do what their founder did, but time has come for them to enter the fight.

But this is my opinion.

Angelo said...

"but time has come for them to enter the fight". The SSPX has in fact been in the fight for a long time, that's why they're in a irregular position. There are modernists who have sabotaged their regularization for a long time. Those who are attending the meeting I imagine just want it to go all smoothly. And then we will have another Roman meeting where things are said and nothing is accomplished. A bunch of men who have no real interest in what the desire of Our Lord Jesus Christ wills. Its been happening for 50 years. They need to be like the men of old in the Church, ready to speak and speak loudly even to the point of death. This is Christ's Church not theirs!