Rorate Caeli

What is happening in the Vatican?

Roberto de Mattei



What is happening in the Vatican? Catholics all over the world are in consternation and wondering what sense to make of the news that has broken out in the press and that appears to reveal the existence of an ecclesiastical war going on inside the Leonine Walls, the consequences of which are being deliberately exaggerated by the mass media. Nonetheless, even if it is not easy to understand what is happening, we can make an effort to do so. 

It is not without significance that this self-combustion is flaring up right at the moment when the 50th anniversary of Vatican II is about to take place. Among all the documents of that Council, the most emblematic and perhaps the most discussed is the constitution Gaudium et Spes, which the theologian Joseph Ratzinger did not like. In that document, the embrace of the Church with the contemporary world was celebrated with irenic optimism. It was the world of the 1960s, steeped in consumerism and secularism; a world in which grew the shadow of Communist imperialism, which the Council did not want to address. 

The Vatican saw the positive aspects of modernity, but was not aware of the dangers and so renounced denouncing its errors, refusing to acknowledge its anti-Christian roots. The Vatican set out to listen to the world and tried to interpret the “signs of the times”, assuming that history would bring indefinite progress (automatically). The Council Fathers appeared to be in a hurry to abandon the past, in the conviction that the future would be propitious for the Church and mankind. Unfortunately, it was not so. In the years following the Council, the vertical pursuit of transcendent principles was replaced by the pursuit of earthly and worldly values. 

The philosophical principle of immanence was translated into a horizontal and sociological vision of Christianity, symbolized, in the liturgy, by the altar facing the people. The “conversio ad populum” brought with it unprecedented artistic devastation and transformed the image of the Mystical Body of Christ into that of a social body emptied of its supernatural soul. But if the Church turns its back on the supernatural and the transcendent in order to turn towards the natural and the circumstantial, the teachings of the Gospel, that one needs to be "in the world, but not of the world," are turned upside down: she stops christianizing the world and is made worldy by it. 

The Kingdom of God becomes power structure in which calculation and political reason, human passions, and contingent interests dominate. The “anthropological shift” put a lot of focus on the presence of man to the Church, but very little on the presence of God. When we here speak of the Church, naturally, we do not refer to the Church herself, but to the men who are part of Her. The Church is of a Divine nature which cannot be darkened and that makes Her always pure and immaculate. But Her human dimension can be covered by that soot which Benedict XVI, during the Via Crucis just before he was elected, called “filth” and that Paul VI, faced with the conciliar rifts, defined, with words unwittingly prophetic, “the smoke of Satan” that had entered the temple of God. 

 Before the weakness and misery of men, the smoke of Satan are the heretical discourses and ambiguous affirmations, which started with the Second Vatican Council and still continue in the Church. Not to mention that the work has not yet begun that John Paul II called a "purification of the memory” - but that we could more simply call an “examination of conscience”, in order to understand where one has erred, what one must correct, and how one must correspond to the will of Jesus Christ, Who remains the only Savior, not only of His Mystical Body, but of a society gone adrift. 

The Church is going through an age of crises, but She is rich in spiritual resources and holiness which continue to shine in many souls. The hour of darkness is always accompanied by the hour of light which has kept shining brightly throughout the history of the Church.

[Source: Riscossa Cristiana - Translation: Contributor Francesca Romana]

15 comments:

Matthew M said...

As the old saying goes, it's always darkest right before it goes pitch black!
If the Church truly is the Church as has been claimed for two thousand years the True Light will shine forth.
The darkness like the gates of hell shall not prevail before the Truth.

Cruise the Groove. said...

Yes, but the light might only shine forth in certain parts of the Church.

Fr Levi said...

Strange days. A memorare for the Holy Father & a few more for the Church might be in order ...

Captain Blaise said...

I Hate Vatican II

I am not Spartacus said...

In February, during the last year of The Golden Age of Faith of the 1960s, the novelty of "Ordinary Time" was imposed by Pope Paul VI and that has contributed not a little to the idea that the Ark of Salvation with its Salvific Sacramental System was focused too much on the future and too little on the here-and-now and so service supplanted salvation as the task of His Church.

And so we razed the bastions and engaged in an architectural Iconoclasm of consecrated Churches last seen in the west during the Protestant Revolution and then Death and Hell were similarly destroyed as truths by the intellectual iconoclasm of ignoring.

On the other hand, we got to sing "Soon and very Soon" at the Lil' Liturgy...

Timothy Mulligan said...

Captain Blaise, I esteem your concision.

David said...

Not to mention that the work has not yet begun that John Paul II called a "purification of the memory” - but that we could more simply call an “examination of conscience”

Again, the implication here is that an orthodox John Paul II was helpless in the face of heterodox forces that were beyond his control. The obvious desire to exonerate that Pope of the chaos of the post-conciliar Church is probably well-intentioned but is not realistic since the late Pope added much fuel to the fire through his "hands off" approach to heresy, the appointment of heterodox men to the episcopate, his flagrant violation of the Church's teaching on communicatio in sacris (for example, his participation in a Voodoo - yes, Voodoo - ritual in Togoville in August 1985) which is based on divine law and not merely on reformable ecclesiastical law, and his numerous statements in Wednesday Audiences that contradicted prior magisterial teaching (for example, denying that Heaven is a place and not just a state of being).

New Catholic said...

De Mattei does not want to exonerate anyone.

NIANTIC said...

Can one really with a straight face say that the Holy Ghost guided the Vll council?? And the aftermath??
Arrogant men filled with pride were in charge. There is just no other logical explanation for the chaos we are living through.
Of course the Holy Ghost has not abandoned the Church and we do have islands of sanity and traditional faith. But I wish those "in charge" in Rome would finally be honest Christians and admit to the disaster and invoke the Holy Ghost for His aid to correct the disaster which has caused the loss of countless souls.
How can they talk about any "new evangelization" without a huge mea culpa for Vll and its implementation. Without honesty and a return to Tradition all their good intentions will be a huge and regrettable failure. Is anyone listening in Rome? Lord have mercy.

Matt said...

NIANTIC said, "Can one really with a straight face say that the Holy Ghost guided the Vll council?? And the aftermath??

Arrogant men filled with pride were in charge. There is just no other logical explanation for the chaos we are living through, of course the Holy Ghost has not abandoned the Church and we do have islands of sanity and traditional faith. But I wish those "in charge" in Rome would finally be honest Christians and admit to the disaster and invoke the Holy Ghost for His aid to correct the disaster which has caused the loss of countless souls.

How can they talk about any "new evangelization" without a huge mea culpa for VII and its implementation. Without honesty and a return to Tradition all their good intentions will be a huge and regrettable failure. Is anyone listening in Rome? Lord have mercy.
"


Very true. Now, perhaps the compuction John XXIII had in calling the Council was something entirely different than what it turned into, but nonetheless the aftermath, I M O, couldn't be of God.

As I am not Spartacus said, "And so we razed the bastions and engaged in an architectural Iconoclasm of consecrated Churches last seen in the west during the Protestant Revolution and then Death and Hell were similarly destroyed as truths by the intellectual iconoclasm of ignoring.

On the other hand, we got to sing "Soon and very Soon" at the Lil' Liturgy...
"


No, NIANTIC, very few in Rome are listening because the mentality of those who brought about what was described above still infest the halls of the Vatican!

Matt

Manfred said...

The Blessed Mother attempted to warn us which is why the Third Secret was to be broadcast no later than 1960. When each Catholic realizes that HIS /HER SALVATION is at terrible risk, then will the Church begin to resume Its correct mission. When the Jesuits were Catholic, they preached in parish missions: Death, Judgement, Heaven or Hell.

Scholar said...

"There's going to be a Kaboom. An earth shattering Kaboom."

- Marvin the Martian

John King said...

I thought the saying was, "the darkest hour is just before dawn..."

Shane said...

For an illustration of this check out this from this evening. It utterly sickened me:

http://www.dublindiocese.ie/content/homily-theological-seminar

At the same seminar, Cardinal Ouellet said: "Vatican II was a breath of Pentecost".

Barbara said...

Shane,
The reference to that seminar has been taken down from the site.