Rorate Caeli
The future of the restoration in America?

We recently brought to our readers' attention the news that -- and subsequent pictures of -- the FSSP would be ordaining seminarians in the minor orders. (See the pictures here. -- CAP) On Candlemas, the SSPX Superior General, Bishop Fellay, visited his United States seminary in Winona, Minn.

You may click here to view some photos of numerous young men receiving their cassocks, tonsure and minor orders.
Please pray for these men.
And please remember to follow @RorateCaeli on Twitter.

25 comments:

  1. I will pray that these fine young men (and that they are) will one day be reconciled to Rome, and to the Successor to Peter. From where I sit, it's a win-win.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous5:04 AM

    What has any of this to do with the FSSP, which among other pesky details is in union with the Church?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous8:35 AM

    Lord Jesus Christ give us holy priests.

    Our Lady of Lourdes pray for all the faithful priests left in the world today. Not too many of them.
    To your Maternal protection we entrust them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hope Springs Eternal11:27 AM

    We pray to restore all things in Christ!

    P.S. Does anyone know of a Tridentine Mass(es) in Lima, Peru?

    ReplyDelete
  5. "The future..."

    A
    PRIEST'S
    HANDS

    Your hand, I'd kiss
    But not for this,
    The mundane games
    Men play.

    Your hand, I'd kiss
    For doing this,
    Absolve my sins
    Away.

    Your hand, I'd kiss
    But not for this,
    That any man
    Can do.

    Your hand, I'd kiss,
    For doing this
    God's strong,
    His choice, the few.

    Your hand, I'd kiss
    But not for this,
    Like any
    Virile male.

    Your hand, I'd kiss
    For doing this,
    Place Him between
    Lips, pale.

    Your hand, I'd kiss
    But not for this,
    Your strength
    Exudes each pore.

    Your hand, I'd kiss
    For doing this,
    Your prayers,
    I do implore.

    http://www.sspx.org/district_news/february_2/february_2_seminary_ceremonies.htm

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oliver1:15 PM

    Restoration of what? The conciliar church is merely widening her base by embracing what Bp. Williamson calls liberalised tradition.

    ReplyDelete
  7. What has any of this to do with the FSSP, which among other pesky details is in union with the Church?

    As is the FSSPX

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous2:49 PM

    Anon 5:04, I mentioned the FSSP in this post because, frankly, I want people to starting seeing the SSPX, the FSSP, the Institute and others in the same light.

    Yes, the SSPX is still in an irregular status. But, we're ALL part of one traditional movement. Or at least it should be one movement.

    If we could all get past the in-fighting and bickering, and truly unite, the restoration would be right around the corner.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Gustavo Ráez-Patiño3:02 PM

    Hi, Hope Springs Eternal.

    Sure! San Marcelo Parish, located at the intersection of Jirón Rufino Torrico and Avenida Emancipación, in downtown Lima. We have the TLM there every Sunday at 10:30 am.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "If we could all get past the in-fighting and bickering, and truly unite, the restoration would be right around the corner."

    Mr Paulitz:

    Yes indeed!!!

    ReplyDelete
  11. M. A.4:00 PM

    "Yes, the SSPX is still in an irregular status. But, we're ALL part of one traditional movement. Or at least it should be one movement."
    _____________

    Amen to that! We should form the intention of being united in their most Sacred Hearts! We can all do so much as instruments of God where He has assigned us our proper responsibilities.

    As to the wicked, may he scatter them, let them turn on themselves unto their own destruction, for they are children of darkness.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Kathleen4:20 PM

    God richly bless them all!

    My heart nearly bursts with gratitude to Our Good God at the sight of all of them and tears of joy stream from my eyes.

    God bless them all as He has certainly blessed us by giving them to us.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous4:24 PM

    Pray for the soul of Dr. John Thornbrugh, academic dean at the FSSP's North American seminary who died recently - http://www.fsspolgs.org/seminary_news.html

    ReplyDelete
  14. I think Fr. Sandmark's interview (SSPX) on DICI.org was a very good, regarding the Catholic faith and his view on the Holy Father. David, I don’t think Fr. Sandmark ever would put himself outside the Church, would you, if you listen to the interview?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Wonderful quote from Bl. Pius IX:

    Pope Pius IX: “The very first elements of Catholic Doctrine teach that no one can be considered a legitimate bishop if he is not united by the communion of Faith and charity with the Rock on which the Church of Christ is built, if he does not adhere to the Supreme Pastor to whom are confided all the sheep so that he may feed them, and if he is not bound to him who has the office of confirming his brethren who are in the world. In fact, 'Our Lord spoke to Peter; he spoke to one alone to establish unity on one alone.' (St. Pacian).”.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Jamie7:27 PM

    Cruise the Groove - that is a wonderful quote and indeed shows that all the Orthodox "Bishops" are not legitimate Bishops.

    Also, I wonder how this quote applies when the majority of Bishops of the world (including our Supreme Pontiff) seem to speak contrary to the Papal office which is taken as a whole and not on an individual level...

    ReplyDelete
  17. Jamie,

    Yes indeed that is an great quote.

    I have never heard Pope Benedict XVI speak contrary to the Papal office.
    Maybe you could cite an example when the Holy Father has not confirmed the brethren and spoken against the Magisterium.

    I doubt it could be done.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hope Springs Eternal1:20 AM

    Gustavo Ráez-Patiño: Thank you so much for the information!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous8:29 AM

    As one who watches the numbers like a hawk, my impression is that the F.S.S.P. is now spending far too much time in 'entrenchment mode'. It rightly alternates between periods of entrenchment and expansion but Fr. Berg seems to be following a permanent entrenchment policy now. It is time for the F.S.S.P. once again to start expanding its diocesan apostolates. After S.P., it was thought that it could concentrate on training diocesan priests to take the T.L.M. to the people. Sadly, this is just not working. Perhaps it might work better once we have the clarification of S.P.

    At the moment, at least, the obstructing bishops have found ways to keep out our Mass. There are a solid thirty of the them in the U.S.A, about fifteen in France and the great majority in Canada and the Philippines and some other countries. The Canadian episcopate, my own, has been wildly successful in persecuting traditioanlists, kicking us in the face, stomping on our heads, and booting us in the unmentionables. THey seem to get their jollies telling us that we can't have our Mass. This Pope and this curia seems to be unable to deal with the Canadian bishops, particularly those in Quebec, the Maritime provinces, and Manitoba. In this Dominion, the Quebec bishops really run the Church. I was hoping that Cardinal Ouellet would be able to deal with them. Apparently, he can not.

    The Philippines seems to be having a similar problem. In Ireland, there has been progress but not nearly enough. The same can be said for the Netherlands. Belgium had a better situation to begin with but the Dioceses of Bruges and Ghent continue to hold out. I should add that the great majority of Italian bishops have simply ignored the m.p., as have those in India, Indonesia, and most of Africa, while the Argentines, led by that papal contender, Carinal Bergoglio, are simply telling our Pope to get lost. Something needs to be done but the F.S.S.P. is busy adding priests to current apostolates. We need more men in the field.

    P.K.T.P.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Hope Springs Eternal3:33 PM

    Although some folks would like to believe it, the SSPX are not the real "enemies" of the Church.

    The SSPX are bold enough to say that the Emperor has no clothes!

    ReplyDelete
  21. "...If we could all get past the in-fighting and bickering, and truly unite, the restoration would be right around the corner..."

    Dear Mr. Paulitz,

    I am helping a Priest acquire something that is very important towards the salvation of souls.

    I applied to a part of Holy Mother Church that should have helped him.

    "...who enjoy full ecclesiastical communion with the Bishop of Rome, currently His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI. Unfortunately the Society of Saint Pius X does not enjoy that full ecclesiastic union, and, therefore, your request has been denied by our Bishop!..."

    That was part of the response.

    The Holy Father must state clearly, and without a doubt, members of Holy Mother Church may give help to the SSPX.

    The Holy Father has stated attending a Mass at an SSPX Chapel fulfils the Sunday obligation of the Faithful.

    Bishops of Holy Mother Church in America have handed over Convent and Monastery buildings to Satan Devil Worshippers, Yoga institutes, Culinary Institutes, and local Freemasonic governments.

    But they would rather bulldoze down a Church before they allow the Mass to be said there by SSPX Priests.

    The SSPX has not caused any of the bickering and fighting; the bickering and fighting has come about by the abandonment of the Faith by Cardinals, Bishops, and Priests outside of that Society.

    Their attack truly is against the Blessed Sacrament. The SSPX is just their visible target.

    You should read this in the light of me not being a follower of the Bishop Bernard Fellay Regime.

    If anything, I could be considered a Lefebvrista.

    There was no guile found in him.

    Pray for Peace, but dress for War.

    *

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous6:18 PM

    What a beautiful picture!!
    It simply expresses clearly the sacrality of the rite and the beauty of the pre-conciliar liturgy.
    May God permit that Holy Mother Church will someday restore these rites in full, that were abolished by none other than Paul VI, who also permitted the subsitution of the Holy Tridentine Mass by the insipd NO rite. For these and other destructive attempts against the Catholic Faith wrought by a group ot heretic thologians who colaborated with him I pray that God may have mercy on his soul.
    CM

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous6:19 PM

    PKTP, the Fraternity can't expand without new priests, and that's the problem. Not an entrenchment mentality.

    They have many seminarians but it's a seven-year formation. They want to expand but needs priests and bishops willing to accept them.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Martin6:40 PM

    "They want to expand but needs priests and bishops willing to accept them."

    Mr Paulitz,

    I agree.
    In the diocese where I live the bihop, for whatever reason, will not at present accept FSSP priests, even though the desire of the faithful is there and efforts have been to meet this need.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Anonymous8:47 PM

    That is the case in the archdioceses of Washington, Baltimore and many others in the US.

    ReplyDelete

Comment boxes are debate forums for readers and contributors of RORATE CÆLI.

Please, DO NOT assume that RORATE CÆLI contributors or moderators necessarily agree with or otherwise endorse any particular comment just because they let it stand.

_______
NOTES

(1) This is our living room, in a deeply Catholic house, and you are our guest. Please, behave accordingly. Any comment may be blocked or deleted, at any time, whenever we perceive anything that is not up to our standards, not conducive to a healthy conversation or a healthy Catholic environment, or simply not to our liking.

(2) By clicking on the "publish your comment" button, please remain aware that you are choosing to make your comment public - that is, the comment box is not to be used for private and confidential correspondence with contributors and moderators.

(3) Any name/ pseudonym/ denomination may be freely used simply by choosing the third option, "Name/URL" (the URL box may be left empty), when posting your comment - therefore, there is no reason whatsoever to simply post as "Anonymous", making debate unnecessarily harder to follow. Any comment signed simply as "Anonymous" will be blocked.

Thank you!