by Aldo Maria Valli
August 26, 2018
“Bishops and priests, abusing their
authority, have committed horrendous crimes to the detriment of their faithful,
minors, innocent victims, and young men eager to offer their lives to the
Church, or by their silence have not prevented that such crimes continue to be
perpetrated.”
Writing these words is an Archbishop,
former Apostolic Nuncio of the United States from 2011 to 2016. Now retired, he has decided to open his
heart and tell all he came to know about the sequence of events regarding sexual abuses in the Church. A testimony
which concludes with a hard and peremptory ‘invitation’: Pope Francis should
step down. Because also he knew, but
covered up.
The author of this affidavit, as La Verita reports today, is Monsignor
Carlo Maria Viganò, 77, who, before being sent as Nuncio to the United States,
was in charge of the Governorate of
Vatican City State, and before that Nuncio in Nigeria, Delegate for the
Pontifical Representatives of the Secretary of State of the Holy See and Member
of the Disciplinary Commission of the Roman Curia.
“To restore the beauty of holiness to
the face of the Bride of Christ, which is terribly disfigured by so many
abominable crimes”. This is the motive for the Monsignor’s decision to speak
out. “If we truly want to free the
Church from the fetid swamp into which she has fallen, we must have the courage
to tear down the culture of secrecy and publicly confess the truths we have
kept hidden. We must tear down the conspiracy of silence with which bishops and
priests have protected themselves at the expense of their faithful, a
conspiracy of silence which in the eyes of the world risks making the Church
look like a sect, a conspiracy of silence not so dissimilar than that which prevails
in the mafia.”
And the facts follow the words, that is the news. Documented, described in detail. The tone is grief-laden, but the style dry.
The straw that broke the camel’s back
was the case of Cardinal McCarrick. When he saw that the entire hierarchy of
the Church were taken aback when faced with the wicked deeds committed by
“Uncle Ted” which have emerged in plain evidence over the last few months and
so much so that there were a flood of “I didn’t know[s]”, Monsignor Viganò started writing. An
indictment which begins way back, before Francis’ pontificate, and reaches the
present day.
“But now that the corruption has reached
the very top of the Church’s hierarchy, my conscience dictates that I reveal
those truths regarding the heart-breaking case of the Archbishop Emeritus of
Washington, D.C., Theodore McCarrick, which I came to know in the course of the
duties entrusted to me by St. John Paul II, as Delegate for Pontifical
Representations, from 1998 to 2009, and by Pope Benedict XVI, as Apostolic
Nuncio to the United States of America, from October 19, 2011 until end of May
2016.”
Viganò reports that two former Nuncios
of the United States, now both dead, prematurely, that is Gabriel Montalvo (in
service from 1998 to 2005) and Pietro Sambi (who covered the office from 2005
to 2011), “ did not fail to inform the Holy See immediately, as soon as they
learned of Archbishop McCarrick’s gravely immoral behaviour with seminarians
and priests.” But no-one did anything.
In particular, Viganò reveals that “the
Nuncio Sambi transmitted to the Cardinal
Secretary of State, Tarcisio Bertone, an Indictment Memorandum against
McCarrick by the priest Gregory Littleton of the diocese of Charlotte, who was
reduced to the lay state for a violation of minors, together with two documents
from the same Littleton, in which he recounted his tragic story of sexual abuse
by the then-Archbishop of Newark and several other priests and seminarians. The
Nuncio added that Littleton had already forwarded his Memorandum to about
twenty people, including civil and ecclesiastical judicial authorities, police
and lawyers, in June 2006, and that it was therefore very likely that the news
would soon be made public. He therefore called for a prompt intervention by the
Holy See”.
As Delegate for Pontifical
Representations, in 2006, Viganò writes a memo on the Littleton case and sends
it to Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone and the Substitute Leonardo Sandri. He states that
the behaviour attributed to Mc Carrick is of such gravity and wickedness as to
provoke bewilderment, but the accusations are accurate and there is mention
also of sacrilegious celebration of the Eucharist with the same priests
involved in the depravations.
Consequently, in his memo Viganò asks, forcibly, for once, that the
ecclesiastical authorities intervene before the civil authorities and before
the case breaks out in the press. It would be salutary. But there is no
reaction from his superiors. And the memo is never returned to him.
Viganò doesn’t give up and returns to the office in 2008. Richard Sipe , psychotherapist and expert in
the sexual behaviour of priests and their superiors, that same year, writes a
letter to Benedict XVI wherein the title says it all: “Your Holiness, I Have
the Evidence . Cardinal McCarrick Is a Homosexual, Please Act.” The Prefect of
the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal William Levada, and
the Cardinal Secretary of State Tarcisio Bertone are immediately informed about
it. Moreover, Viganò delivers a memo in
this regard to the new Substitute Fernando Filoni. And while he’s at he attaches the memo of two
years before, again underlining the gravity of the situation. But the reaction
of the hierarchy is always the same: no response.
It is thanks to Cardinal Giovanni
Battista Re , the then Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops that Viganò came
to know that Pope Benedict XVI , upon knowledge
of Sipe’s denunciation, had ordered McCarrick to leave the seminary
where he resided and prohibited him celebrating Mass publicly, participating in
meetings, giving conferences and travelling, with the obligation of dedicating
himself to a life of prayer and penance.
It is the the Nuncio Sambi who
communicates these measures to McCarrick, during a stormy meeting. Then, when Viganò becomes the Nuncio of the
United States, it is precisely he who
reminds McCarrick of the the Pope’s orders, who then merely mutters a
confused reply attempting ineptly to minimize [everything].
But how did McCarrick manage to become
what he became (Archbishop of Washington,
and Cardinal, after being Archbishop of Newark) seeing his
behaviour was what it was?
If you ask this to Monsignor Viganò, he lays the responsibility of McCarrick’s career on Cardinal Angelo
Sodano, Secretary of State from 1991 to 2006 and Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, his
successor. But Viganò involves also the present Secretary of State Pietro
Parolin. When in fact it is clear to everyone that McCarrick does not obey Benedict’s
orders and instead travels the world,
Viganò also writes to Parloin asking if the sanctions are still valid , but his
question remains answers – as usual - unanswered.
Others who certainly knew, but kept
silent, were, writes Viganò: Cardinal
Levada, Cardinal Sandri, Monsignor Becciu (now a cardinal) and Cardinals Lajolo
and Mamberti. In other words – everybody
at the top.
No less devastating, according to Viganò’s
revelations, is the picture in the United States. Also there everyone knew, starting with
Cardinal Wuerl, McCarrick’s successor in Washington, but no-one did a
thing. And today Wuerl’s declarations,
where he says he
knew nothing “are absolutely laughable”.
Regarding Cardinal Kevin Farrell, actual Prefect of the
Vatican Ministry for the Laity, Family and Life, who, in turn, said he had
never heard anything about Cardinal McCarrick’s abuses, Viganò writes: “Given
his tenure in Washington, Dallas and now Rome, I think no one can honestly
believe him”.
Lastly of Cardinal Sean O’Malley,
Archbishop of Boston and Head of the Vatican Commission for The Protection of
Minors, Viganò states: “I would simply say that his latest statements on the
McCarrick case are disconcerting, and have totally obscured his transparency
and credibility.”
At this point, however, the drama of
Monsignor Viganò’s affidavit rises further in tone, as he implicates Pope
Francis directly.
It is 2013, in the month of June. There
is a meeting in Rome of the Nuncios from all over the world and also Monsignor
Viganò is present. Stirred by the prospect of his first encounter with the new
Pontiff, the Archbishop goes to Casa Santa Marta, the residence chosen by
Bergoglio instead of the Apostolic Palace, and who does he find there? No other than a
relaxed and smiling Cardinal McCarrick wearing the red-trimmed cassock and he
greets Viganò letting him know in mocking tone: “The Pope received me yesterday,
tomorrow I’m going to China.”
Viganò notes: “At the time I knew
nothing of his long friendship with Cardinal Bergoglio and of the important
part he had played in his recent election, as McCarrick himself would later
reveal in a lecture at Villanova University and in an interview with the
National Catholic Reporter. Nor had I ever thought of the fact that he had
participated in the preliminary meetings of the recent conclave, and of the
role he had been able to have as a cardinal elector in the 2005 conclave.
Therefore I did not immediately grasp the meaning of the encrypted message that
McCarrick had communicated to me, but that would become clear to me in the days
immediately following.”
The first eagerly awaited meeting of
Viganò with the Pope has something of the surreal about it and leaves the poor
Nuncio speechless. But the worst is yet to come.
It is Sunday, June 23rd 2013.
The Pope receives Viganò before the Angelus. He makes some statements that
sound somewhat enigmatic to the Archbishop, then point-blank he asks him: “What
is Cardinal McCarrick like?” To which
the Nuncio replies: “Holy Father, I don’t know if you know Cardinal McCarrick,
but if you ask the Congregation for Bishops there is a dossier this thick about
him. He corrupted generations of seminarians and priests and Pope Benedict
ordered him to withdraw to a life of prayer and penance.” The Pope’s reaction?
None at all. Actually, Bergoglio immediately changes the subject. Well, then
wonders a bewildered Viganò , why did he ask me that question?
He understood upon his return to
Washington. He learns that between the Pope and McCarrick there is a close relationship.
The question the Pope asked the Nuncio was thus a trap. The fact is that
according to Monsignor Viganò’s account, since June 23rd 2013 at
least, Pope Francis has known about the McCarrick case.
At this point Viganò comments: “Pope
Francis has repeatedly asked for total transparency in the Church and for
bishops and faithful to act with parrhesia. The faithful throughout the world
also demand this of him in an exemplary manner.
He must honestly state when he first learned about the crimes committed
by McCarrick, who abused his authority with seminarians and priests.
In any case, the Pope learned about it from me
on June 23, 2013 and continued to cover for him. He did not take into account
the sanctions that Pope Benedict had imposed on him and made him his trusted counsellor
along with Cardinal Maradiaga. The latter [Maradiaga] is so confident of the
Pope’s protection that he can dismiss as “gossip” the heartfelt appeals of
dozens of his seminarians, who found the courage to write to him after one of
them tried to commit suicide over homosexual abuse in the seminary.”
So Francis knew. He has known for a
while, at least five years. “He has known since June 23rd 2013 that
McCarrick was a serial predator. But “despite knowing he was a corrupt man, he covered for him to
the bitter end; indeed, he made McCarrick’s advice his own, which was certainly
not inspired by sound intentions and for love of the Church. It was only when
he was forced by the report of the abuse of a minor, again on the basis of
media attention, that he took action [regarding McCarrick] to save his image in
the media.”
“Now
– continues Viganò - in the United
States a chorus of voices is rising especially from the lay faithful and has
recently been joined by several bishops and priests, asking that all those who,
by their silence, covered up McCarrick’s criminal behavior, or who used him to
advance their career or promote their intentions, ambitions and power in the
Church, should resign.
But this will not be enough to heal the
situation of extremely grave immoral behaviour by the clergy, bishops and
priests. A time of conversion and penance must be proclaimed. The virtue of
chastity must be recovered in the clergy and in seminaries. Corruption in the
misuse of the Church’s resources and of the offerings of the faithful must be
fought against. The seriousness of homosexual behaviour must be denounced.”
“I implore everyone, especially Bishops,
to speak up in order to defeat this conspiracy of silence that is so
widespread, and to report the cases of abuse they know about to the media and
civil authorities.
Let us heed the most powerful message that St.
John Paul II left us as an inheritance: Do not be afraid! Do not be afraid!”
At the Angelus on August 12th
Francis said that “Everyone is guilty of the good that he could have done but
didn’t do...if we don’t oppose evil, we feed it tacitly. It is necessary to
intervene where evil is spreading; as evil spreads where bold Christians are lacking in opposing it
with good.”
If this is true, and it is, how much graver
is the responsibility of the Pope, the Supreme Pastor! Yet, sustains Viganò, in the case of
McCarrick, the Supreme Pastor “not only did not oppose evil but associated
himself in doing evil with someone he knew to be deeply corrupt. He followed
the advice of someone he knew well to be a pervert, thus multiplying
exponentially with his supreme authority the evil done by McCarrick. And how
many other evil pastors is Francis still continuing to prop up in their active
destruction of the Church!
Francis is abdicating the mandate which
Christ gave to Peter to confirm the brethren. Indeed, by his action he has
divided them, led them into error, and encouraged the wolves to continue to
tear apart the sheep of Christ’s flock. “
Pope Francis then: “must acknowledge his
mistakes and, in keeping with the proclaimed principle of zero tolerance, Pope
Francis must be the first to set a good example for cardinals and bishops who
covered up McCarrick’s abuses and resign along with all of them.”
This is the stipulation, peremptory, in
no uncertain terms: resignation. The only action that can aid recovery.
The situation is dramatic, but Monsignor
Viganò invites us not to lose hope.
Even “in disorientation and sadness” he
says, let us think of the many priests and bishops who fulfil their duties and
we must not lose faith in the Lord. Rather, it is precisely at these moments
that “the grace of the Lord reveals itself abundantly and makes His endless
mercy available to all; but this is conceded only to those who are truly
repentant and propose sincerely to mend their ways. This is the most fitting
time for the Church to confess its sins, to convert and do penance.
Let us all pray for the Church and the Pope, remembering how many times he has
asked us to pray for him.”
___________
Quotations from Monsignor Viganò taken
from the original English version here: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4784141/TESTIMONYXCMVX-XENGLISH-CORRECTED-FINAL-VERSION.pdf
Translation
of Aldo Maria Valli’s article: Contributor Francesa Romana
