Rorate Caeli

Petrus Apostolus:
the Pope's grand lectio on Saint Peter and Rome

Just hours before the announcement of Pope Benedict's resignation, we noticed here the deeply Roman, Petrine, lesson in his meeting with the seminarians of Rome. It turned out to be his last meeting with them, and his last words as Pope on the first Bishop of Rome, and he surely knew it quite well by then that it would be the last time that, as Pope, Peter would teach us about Peter, which makes it even more significant. It also seems to us a great apologetic text to send to members of non-Catholic confessions who are considering joining the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.

The official translation has now been made available at the Holy See website, and we highlight the same excerpts below:

_________________________________


We have heard three verses from the First Letter of St Peter (cf. 1:3-5). Before going into this text it seems to me important to be aware of the fact that it is Peter who is speaking. The first two words of the Letter are Petrus apostolus(cf. v.1): he speaks and he speaks to the Churches in Asia and calls the faithful “chosen”, and “exiles of the Dispersion” (ibid.). Let us reflect a little on this. Peter is speaking and — as we hear at the end of the Letter — he is speaking from Rome, which he called “Babylon” (cf. 5:13). Peter speaks as if it were a first encyclical with which the first Apostle, Vicar of Christ, addresses the Church of all time.

Peter, an apostle: thus the one who is speaking is the one who found the Messiah in Jesus Christ, who was the first to speak on behalf of the future Church: “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God” (cf. Mt 16:16). The one who introduced us to this faith is speaking, the one to whom the Lord said: “I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven” (cf. Mt 16:19), to whom he entrusted his flock after the Resurrection, saying to him three times: “Feed my lambs...Tend my sheep” (cf. Jn 21:15-17). And it is also the man who fell who is speaking, the man who denied Jesus three times and was granted the grace to see Jesus’ look, to feel deeply moved in his heart and to find forgiveness and a renewal of his mission. However, above all it is important that this man, full of passion, full of longing for God, full of a desire for the Kingdom of God, for the Messiah, this man who has found Jesus, the Lord and the Messiah, is also the man who sinned, who fell; and yet he remained in God’s sight and in this way he remained responsible for the Lord’s Church, he remained the one assigned by Christ, he remained the messenger of Christ’s love.

Peter the Apostle is speaking but the exegetes tell us: it is impossible for this Letter to have been written by Peter because the Greek is so good that it cannot be the Greek of a fisherman from the Sea of Galilee. And it is not only the language — the syntax is excellent — but also the thought which is already quite mature, there are actual formulas in which the faith and the reflection of the Church are summed up. These exegetes say, therefore: it had already reached a degree of development that cannot be Peter’s. How does one respond? There are two important positions: first, Peter himself — that is, the Letter — gives us a clue, for at the end of the writing he says I write to you: “By Silvanus... dia Silvanus”. This “by” [dia] could mean various things. It may mean that he [Silvanus] brings or transmits; it may mean that Silvanus helped him write it; it may mean that in practice it was really Silvanus who wrote it. In any case, we may conclude that the Letter itself points out to us that Peter was not alone in writing this Letter but it expresses the faith of a Church, which is already on a journey of faith, a faith increasingly mature. He does not write alone, as an isolated individual; he writes with the assistance of the Church, of people who help him to deepen the faith, to enter into the depths of his thought, of his rationality, of his profundity. And this is very important: Peter is not speaking as an individual, he is speaking ex persona Ecclesiae, he is speaking as a man of the Church, as an individual of course, with his personal responsibility, but also as a person who speaks on behalf of the Church; not only private and original ideas, not as a 19th-century genius who wished to express only personal and original ideas that no one else could have expressed first. No. He does not speak as an individualistic genius, but speaks, precisely, in the communion of the Church. In the Apocalypse, in the initial vision of Christ, it is said that Christ’s voice is like the sound of many waters (cf. Rev 1:15). This means: Christ’s voice gathers together all the waters of the world, bears within it all the living waters that give life to the world; he is a Person, but this is the very greatness of the Lord, that he bears within him all the rivers of the Old Testament, indeed, of the wisdom of peoples. ...

I would like to say something more: St Peter writes from Rome. This is important. Here we already have the Bishop of Rome, we have the beginning of Succession, we already have the beginning of the actual Primacy located in Rome, not only granted by the Lord but placed here, in this city, in this world capital. How did Peter come to Rome? This is a serious question. The Acts of the Apostles tell us that after his escape from Herod’s prison, he went to another place (cf. 12:17) — eis eteron topon— where he went is not known; some say to Antioch, others, to Rome. In any case, in this capital it should also be said that before fleeing he entrusted the Judaeo-Christian Church, the Church of Jerusalem, to James, and in entrusting her to James he nevertheless remained Primate of the universal Church, of the Church of the Gentiles but also of the Judaeo-Christian Church. And here in Rome he found a great Judaeo-Christian community. The liturgists tell us that in the Roman Canon there are traces of a characteristically Judaeo-Christian language. Thus we see that in Rome both parts of the Church were to be found: the Judaeo-Christian and the pagan-Christian, united, an expression of the universal Church. And for Peter, moving from Jerusalem to Rome meant moving to the universality of the Church, moving to the Church of the Gentiles and of all the epochs, to the Church that also still belongs to the Jews

And I think that in going to Rome St Peter not only thought of this transfer: Jerusalem/Rome, Judaeo-Christian Church/universal Church. He certainly also remembered Jesus’ last words to him, recorded by St John: “when you are old, you will stretch out your hands, and another will gird you and carry you where you do not wish to go” (cf. Jn 21:18). It is a prophecy of the crucifixion. Philologists show us that “stretch out your hands” is a precise, technical expression for the crucifixion. St Peter knew that his end would be martyrdom, would be the cross: that it would therefore be following Christ completely. Consequently, in going to Rome there is no doubt that he was also going to martyrdom: martyrdom awaited him in Babylon. The primacy, therefore, has this content of universality but it has a martyrological content as well. Furthermore, Rome had been a place of martyrdom from the outset. In going to Rome, Peter once again accepts this word of the Lord: he heads for the cross and invites us too to accept the martyrological aspect of Christianity, which may have very different forms. And the cross may have very different forms, but no one can be Christian without following the Crucified One, without accepting the martyrological moment too.
...
Perhaps today we are tempted to say: we do not want to rejoice at having been chosen, for this would be triumphalism. It would be triumphalism to think that God had chosen me because I was so important. This would really be erroneous triumphalism. However, being glad because God wanted me is not triumphalism. Rather, it is gratitude and I think we should re-learn this joy: God wanted me to be born in this way, into a Catholic family, he wanted me to know Jesus from the first. What a gift to be wanted by God so that I could know his face, so that I could know Jesus Christ, the human face of God, the human history of God in this world! Being joyful because he has chosen me to be a Catholic, to be in this Church of his, where subsistit Ecclesia unica; we should rejoice because God has given me this grace, this beauty of knowing the fullness of God’s truth, the joy of his love.
...
Christians are certainly not only foreigners; we are also Christian nations, we are proud of having contributed to the formation of culture; there is a healthy patriotism, a healthy joy of belonging to a nation that has a great history of culture and of faith. Yet, as Christians, we are always also foreigners — the destiny of Abraham, described in the Letter to the Hebrews. As Christians we are, even today, also always foreigners. In the work place Christians are a minority, they find themselves in an extraneous situation; it is surprising that a person today can still believe and live like this. This is also part of our life: it is a form of being with the Crucified Christ; this being foreigners, not living in the way that everyone else lives, but living — or at least seeking to live — in accordance with his Word, very differently from what everyone says. And it is precisely this that is characteristic of Christians. They all say: “But everyone does this, why don’t I?” No, I don’t, because I want to live in accordance with God. St Augustine once said: “Christians are those who do not have their roots below, like trees, but have their roots above, and they do not live this gravity in the natural downwards gravitation”. Let us pray the Lord that he help us to accept this mission of living as exiles, as a minority, in a certain sense, of living as foreigners and yet being responsible for others and, in this way, reinforcing the goodness in our world.
...
[I]nheritance. It is a very important word in the Old Testament, where Abraham is told that his seed will inherit the earth, and this was always the promise for his descendents. You will have the earth, you will be heirs of the earth. In the New Testament, this word becomes a word for us; we are heirs, not of a specific country, but of the land of God, of the future of God. Inheritance is something of the future, and thus this word tells us above all that as Christians we have a future, the future is ours, the future is God’s. Thus, being Christians, we know that the future is ours and the tree of the Church is not a tree that is dying but a tree that constantly puts out new shoots. Therefore we have a reason not to let ourselves be upset, as Pope John said, by the prophets of doom who say: well, the Church is a tree that grew from the mustard seed, grew for two thousand years, now she has time behind her, it is now time for her to die. No. The Church is ever renewed, she is always reborn. The future belongs to us. Of course, there is a false optimism and a false pessimism. A false pessimism tells us that the epoch of Christianity is over. No: it is beginning again! The false optimism was the post-Council optimism, when convents closed, seminaries closed and they said “but... nothing, everything is fine!”.... No! Everything is not fine. There are also serious, dangerous omissions and we have to recognize with healthy realism that in this way things are not all right, it is not all right when errors are made. However, we must also be certain at the same time that if, here and there, the Church is dying because of the sins of men and women, because of their non-belief, at the same time she is reborn. The future really belongs to God: this is the great certainty of our life, the great, true optimism that we know. The Church is the tree of God that lives for ever and bears within her eternity and the true inheritance: eternal life.
...
And, lastly, “guarded through faith”. The New Testament text, from the Letter of St Peter, uses a rare word here, phrouroumenoi, which means: there are the “guards” and faith is like the guards who preserve the integrity of my being, of my faith. This word interprets in particular “the guards” at the gates of a city, where they stand and keep watch over the city so that it is not invaded by destructive powers. Thus faith is a “guard” of my being, of my life, of my inheritance. We must be grateful for this vigilance of faith that protects us, helps us, guides us, gives us the security: God does not let me fall from his hands.

Benedict XVI
February 8, 2013

[P.S. Your Holiness, we will miss you so much!]

16 comments:

Elizabeth said...

That was beautiful. It strikes me as quite a contrast from the feeling I came away with after reading his words about VII and seemingly placing blame on the media, not on the Council itself. Thank you for this, Holy Father. I will miss you too!

Supertradmum said...

Your blog is awesome and this is absolutely fantastic. Thanks so much for being on top of things here.

Hilltop said...

Verily, a meet and just discussion...
AND
A palm branch extended to +Fellay?!
His Holiness pointedly uses the words "errors are made".
He uses them in indictment of past actions, though, so he can be faithfully paraphrased as haven written "errors WERE made" and all this in direct reference to the Vat II Council.
Further, His Holiness adopts and recites the litany of evils emanating from Vat II that is, in sum, a faithful quotation of the SSPX's fully accurate criticisms of the "fruits" of the Council - closed seminaries, etc.
This can readily be seen as a friendly overture to the "Pius Brethren". Will they respond? (I hope and pray!)

Tom said...

There were folks here and elsewhere who claimed that the Holy Father's adbication was part of the Pope's "modernistic" conspiracy to destroy the Papacy...to reduce to the Papacy to that of a mere job.

Well, Pope Bendict XVI's declaration to the the Roman seminarians have discredited and demolished that conspiracy theory.

As Rorate Caeli stated, "we noticed here the deeply Roman, Petrine, lesson in his meeting with the seminarians of Rome."

Tom

Ld.Schmidt said...

Thank you Holy Father, Such elegance and reflection! Would it be wishfull thinking that He-(Poppa) was eluding to the SSPX as the Gaurds? Please, may we offer our Daily Rosary's for the next successor to the Chair of Peter, His intention? In JMJ

Truth Seeker said...

Remember that His Holiness Benedict XVI was first the child of God Josef by his baptism.

He never lost his FIRST responsibility to follow Christ and save his own soul.

May God bless him as he prepares to enter a new phase of his ministry--prayer and intercession is virtual seclusion.

Remember that God has given us ALL a gift as he starts this.

Francis Ma said...

Tom said.."There were folks here and elsewhere who claimed that the Holy Father's adbication was part of the Pope's "modernistic" conspiracy to destroy the Papacy...to reduce to the Papacy to that of a mere job. Well, Pope Bendict XVI's declaration to the the Roman seminarians have discredited and demolished that conspiracy theory".

I don't think so Tom. Unfortunately alot of liberal 1960's "spirit" of Vatican II "Catholics", many Neo-Catholics along with secularists, leftists, masons and modernist elites in the media, academia and sadly as I said in the Church think the Papacy is a mere job, and this abdication by Pope Benedict XVI is their dream come true to prove that the Papacy, like any other elected office and institution, to conform the Church to the world by saying that the Catholic Church is just another man made entity, and not the One True Church/faith established by God (Our Lord) on St. Peter and His successors who is the Bishop of Rome, the Vicar of Christ on earth. These people are already gleefully saying that this abdication will set a precedent to "modernize" the Papacy and the Church. Yes, these people inside and outside the Church are enemies, but they have alot of influence to uncatechized and ignorant Catholics and Non-Catholics alike, and an anti-Catholic and anti-tradition agenda.

Tom said...

Elizabeth said..."It strikes me as quite a contrast from the feeling I came away with after reading his words about VII and seemingly placing blame on the media, not on the Council itself."

His Holiness didn't "seemingly" blame the news media for the collapse of the Vatican II Era Church...he blamed the media in clear, unmistakable terms.

That is a major shift from his "who is to blame for the collapse of the Church following Vatican II" declarations.

In 1998 A.D., as Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, he pinned the collapse of the Vatican II Era Church and Liturgy to "many priests" who "deliberately raised ‘desacralization’ to the level of a program...they put aside the sacred vestments; they have despoiled the churches as much as they could of that splendor which brings to mind the sacred; and they have reduced
the liturgy to the language and the gestures of ordinary life, by means of greetings, common signs of friendship, and such things."

Nine years later, 1997 A.D., as Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, he blamed the collapse of the Church to a great extent upon the "manufactured" liturgical reform (revolution) and the manner in which Pope implemented said reform (revolution), which included the "banning" of the old missal.

Pope Benedict XVI/Cardinal Ratzinger has never blamed the collapse of the Church upon Vatican II...the "real" Council, the actual texts.

He has never blamed the collapse of the Church to the Novus Ordo Mass itself.

Tom

Tom said...

Hilltop said..."A palm branch extended to +Fellay?!
His Holiness pointedly uses the words "errors are made".

"He uses them in indictment of past actions, though, so he can be faithfully paraphrased as haven written "errors WERE made" and all this in direct reference to the Vat II Council.

"Further, His Holiness adopts and recites the litany of evils emanating from Vat II that is, in sum, a faithful quotation of the SSPX's fully accurate criticisms of the "fruits" of the Council - closed seminaries, etc.

"This can readily be seen as a friendly overture to the "Pius Brethren". Will they respond? (I hope and pray!)"

This can be seen as what it was...the Pope/Cardinal Ratzinger as having upheld and promoted the same Traditional belief in the Papacy that he has expressed for decades.

There wasn't one thing new in what His Holiness/Joseph Ratzinger declared as far as that which he has held and expressed.

It is fascinating as to how certain folks, here and elsewhere, have always found an SSPX reference in everything that Pope Benedict XVI has said and done.

The Pope ate mashed potatoes last night..."yep, a clear olive branch extended to the SSPX as Bishop Fellay eats mashed potatoes."

The Pope just played the piano..."uh-huh, a definite SSPX reference as I'm certain that he played Bishop Fellay's favorite song..."Errors and Evil, The Council and the...", well, you know.

Father Federico Lombardi, director of the Holy See Press Office, announced that Pope Benedict XVI just spent seven seconds watching two birds that are perched on a post...

..."A total reference to the SSPX as the birds represent the Pope and Bishop Fellay sitting together in peace. Unless the Pope sees a cat chasing the two birds, we should expect SSPX regularization within the hour."

Tom

Tom said...

"In 1998 A.D., as Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, he pinned the collapse of the Vatican II Era Church."

Sorry. 1988 A.D.

Tom said...

Francis Ma said..."I don't think so Tom. Unfortunately alot of liberal 1960's "spirit" of Vatican II "Catholics", many Neo-Catholics along with secularists, leftists, masons and modernist elites in the media, academia and sadly as I said in the Church think the Papacy is a mere job, and this abdication by Pope Benedict XVI is their dream come true to prove that the Papacy, like any other elected office and institution, to conform the Church to the world by saying that the Catholic Church is just another man made entity, and not the One True Church/faith established by God (Our Lord) on St. Peter and His successors who is the Bishop of Rome, the Vicar of Christ on earth."

You are correct. That is the manner in which certain folks view the Papacy. Interesingly, other folks of that ilk — hateful of the Papacy — have claimed that rather than weaken Papal strength, Pope Benedict XVI and his recent predecessors have reinforced Papal claims and prerogatives.

They have claimed that our recent Popes have acted as big, bad Popes of old supposedly...absolute monarchs, convinced that the Papacy is of divine origin.

Oh, my...how dreadful! Imagine that. Popes who actually believe in the awesome authority assigned by God to His Papacy!

************************

Francis Ma said..."These people are already gleefully saying that this abdication will set a precedent to "modernize" the Papacy and the Church. Yes, these people inside and outside the Church are enemies, but they have alot of influence to uncatechized and ignorant Catholics and Non-Catholics alike, and an anti-Catholic and anti-tradition agenda."

Francis Ma, they can spin the Holy Father's abdication as they please. But their nonsense does not and will not alter the Holy See's teachings in regard to the Papacy.

Pope Benedict XVI's address to the seminarians reinforced Holy Mother Church's unchanged Traditional teachings.

Even Pope Blessed John Paul II, labeled a "modernist" and destroyer of the Papacy by certain folks (they are wrong), presented in his "controversial" Encyclical Ut Unum Sint a rousing Traditional defense and promotion of the Papacy from the lengthy sections 88 to 97.

Even the Society of Saint Pius X, who, in 1995 A.D., were hardly on good terms with Rome, applauded the above.

Certain folks within and without Holy Mother Church may attempt to reduce the Papacy to that of a mere job. But Holy Mother Church has rejected their nonsense — yesterday, today and tomorrow.

The haters of the Papacy whine in vain.

Tom

Gratias said...

Benedict XVI is a very wise teacher. What a joy to have had his powerful intellect at the service of the Church for eight years as Pope. Before that he was one of the brains behind John Paul II as he aged. He also guided the writing of the Catechism of the Catholic Church. He leaves us his thoughts in the form of many books that will stay with the Church through the ages, a new St.Augustine.

Since he is still the sharpest intellect we have, it is hard to accept his abdication. Many of the official duties such as greeting heads of state of bishops could have been delegated to others. The Vatican schedule for a Pope is tremendous.

The great Benedict is a humble teacher that seeks to convince others, not to use papal authority. The modern world has difficulties undersatanding this 85 year old sage. Not only he is still the most lucid teacher we have, but Benedict also embodies the pre- and post-Vatican II world views.

Thank you for eight wonderful years Holy Father.

Francis Ma said...

I just hope and pray that Angelo Cardinal Bagnasco or another pro tradition Cardinal will be elected Pope next month. Benedict XVI definitely did some good things, but he also did some disappointing things as well. Pray for Pope Benedict XVI and to the Holy Ghost for a somewhat trad Pope coming out of the present College of Cardinals to clean up the Church of Christ and set the barque of Peter on the correct course once again, back to Catholic tradition and orthodoxy.

OnEaglesWings said...

With this, I can see Benedict XVI having had many popes and Catholic scholars preceeding him contributiong to the solid message... re VII and it's failings being the fault of the media, not so much. I still am in shock and awe over those words.

Tom said...

Gratias said..."The great Benedict is a humble teacher that seeks to convince others, not to use papal authority."

He has wielded his Papal authority daily. As the Vicar of Christ, he has daily taught, governed and sanctified the Faithful.

He has employed his Papal authority to issue Encyclicals. The promulgation of a Moto Proprio is an exercise of Papal authority.

Via his Papal authority, Pope Benedict XVI has removed wayward bishops and priests from their respective offices. He has lifted excommunications that had been attached to various bishops.

His Papal authority enabled him to launch an Ordinariate to allow groups of Anglicans to enter into communion and total peace with the True Church.

He employed his awesome Papal authority to replace the ancient and holy Traditional Roman Good Friday prayer for the conversion of the Jews with a prayer that was to his liking. He simply forced said prayer upon the Church...and that was that.

Time and again, Pope Benedict XVI has wielded Papal authority.

Tom

Thorin said...

What a wonderful talk by the Holy Father.