Rorate Caeli

"Go home now," Cardinal Roger

Patrick Brennan reports some troubling news, as if it could get any more bizarre:


The Los Angeles Times expresses confusion, as we all should, about what the heck is going on in the Archdiocese of Los Angeles.  Three months ago, Archbishop Gomez relieved his predecessor, Roger Cardinal Mahony, of "public duties" in the Archdiocese, including, according to a spokesman for the Archdiocese at the time of Archbishop Gomez's announcement, celebrating the sacrament of confirmation.  At the moment, however, the Cardinal is traveling around the Archdiocese celebrating that sacrament "every week" (his own words) and telling those who question him about it to "go home now" (his words). Meanwhile, Archbishop Gomez refuses to comment.

Cardinal Mahony's mishandling of his clergy's abuse of children boggles the mind and saddens the heart.  A decade after Cardinal Law was pressured into resigning for his own mishandling of such abuse, Mahony continued the mishandling right up until he submitted his resignation as required at the age of 75, and his successor, who surely knew much or all of what Mahony had done to hide the abuse, distanced himself and the Archdiocese from Mahony only when files Mahony had endlessly litigated to keep secret became public. Two years Archbishop Gomez waited, and when at last he relieved Mahony of his "public duties," he did so only for purposes of a phony publicity stunt, it would now seem.  

Only the Pope can discipline a Cardinal, but Archbishop Gomez has jurisdiction over the confirmation schedule in his own Archdiocese.  We can hope that Pope Francis will ground Cardinal Mahony and turn off his self-serving blog.  We can also hope that Archbishop Gomez will do right by the faithful of his Archdiocese and *in fact* relieve Cardinal Mahony of his public duties in the Archdiocese.  Members of the hierarchy need to stop scandalizing the faithful.  Enough already.  It is Cardinal Mahony who should "go home now."  If Pope Francis seeks to "rebuild" the Church, Cardinal Mahony's public presence is only impeding that all-important work.  Public penance for the Cardinal would be a help to that work on which turns, after all, the salvation of souls.  Archbishop Gomez's integrity is on the line here as well, and the jury -- including in the form of the LA Times -- is observing the evidence as it pours in. 

32 comments:

  1. Could this appalling public disgrace of Archbishop Gomez possibly have occurred absent the direct intervention of the Supreme Pontiff?

    I am not certain which is more horrifying- a "yes" or a "no" answer to the above question.

    This just is not working.



    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous1:45 AM

    I would assume he's working on his own, as Mahoney has always worked on his own, for himself.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Taking off from Rick's point, it seems to me that there are only three possible explanations:

    1. Archbishop Gomez is now witholding disciplinary measures because he thinks it better for the local church in L.A. that the appearance (one would say: hypocrisy) of continuity be maintained.

    2. Gomez wanted to do something but the Vatican failed to give him any indication of support, a la the Washington scene at the time of Humanae Vitae.

    3. Mahony has the goods on Gomez.

    I knew, and went to confession to, then Father Gomez (we called him "Fr. Jose") when he was here in Houston, and he is a very nice, intelligent man who I like very much. I disagree with his apparent open borders idea, but that aside, I hate to see him caught up in this situation, and pray that Our Lady, to whom he is devoted, will send him aid. Only She can help us now.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It would not surprise me if Cardinal Mahony was going against the orders of Abp Gomez, since when was Mahony the crown jewel for obedience...as he once proclaimed Redemptionis Sacramentum didn't need to be put into effect in his diocese because of zero liturgical abuse. Mahony is a very proud person and will not go quietly. This will take a Papal Intervention....there is no way Abp Gomez is going to be able to transform the diocese with Mahony present in the diocese. Even though he has cleaned up some of the Liturgical Abuses that have occured in the diocese. There's a long way to go.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Papal intervention?"

    Dream on. He is only the Bishop of Rome, dontcha know?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Archbishop Gomez reversed his own decree 'relieving' Cardinal Mahony of his public duties after only one day.

    http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2013/02/for-record-on-clarification-of-cardinal.html

    It is rather unfortunate that Patrick Brennan is "confused" about what is happening. There is no confusion here. What is happening right now has Archbishop Gomez's full blessing.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Unless this dude Mahony is literary physicaly pacified and thrown out through the door, he'll continue to reek havoc. But again, this is an NO gaynik regime, the principal wholemark of vastly apostate church. H.H. needs to concecrate Russia without delay. Great unease pervades everywhere. People are restless and anxious. It seems, that civil unrest of unpresedented magnitude is brewing.
    "Pray, hope and don't worry!" St. Padre Pio.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous4:37 AM

    The Holy Father is going to discipline Mahony who boasted about voting for him in the conclave? Right.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This is a non-story -- the Archbishop clarified that the relief of public duty did NOT extend to the Cardinal's priestly vocation, but essentially those belonging to his episcopate emeritus.


    The Cardinal has NOT been barred from giving Mass, nor hearing Confessions, nor from any other basic priestly duties.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous6:30 AM

    rome is weak. the bishops are weak.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Will no one rid me of this priest?

    ReplyDelete
  12. The repudiation of authority continues apace.

    ReplyDelete
  13. You said "Only the Pope can discipline a Cardinal".

    But that is incorrect. It comes under the competence of the CDF because the Pope in the Decree Bom Pastor (of Pope John Paul II) delegated Power to the CDF to be able to do so!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Is it too disrespectful to say psych case or demonic oppression?

    ReplyDelete
  15. It looks to me that the good Archbishop Gomez - who inherited a right bag of worms - has done as much as he possibly could to quell the turbulent Mahoney, who out-ranks him personally. Perhaps the local bishops aren't embarrassed to have Mahoney around confirming for them - one does not know.

    ReplyDelete
  16. This is part of the Problem with many Western Bishops over the last few decades- the reluctance to actually Discipline a fellow cleric Publicly because it is been considered to be "UNPASTORAL" whatever that means. Also the word "COLLEGIALITY" has also been a factor in all this as now the Bishops (and their conferences) are thought to be a "Power Sharing" Parallel Magisterium since the Council. It MUST be CLARIFIED in this Year of Faith.

    ReplyDelete
  17. According to Ed Peters, Mahony's confirmations are licit until "competent ecclesiastical authority" expressly prohibits him from administering sacraments.

    As Archbishop of Los Angeles, Gomez is such an authority, does indeed "outrank" Mahony, and can put a stop to him today. However, Abp. Gomez appeared to undermine his own authority (not to mention calling his competence into question) with the milquetoast "clarifications" issued almost immediately after his so-called ban on the Cardinal.

    This calls to mind the ridiculous episode of Gen. Braxton Bragg issuing a criticism and retraction of one of his own orders.

    In any event, Abp. Gomez and the rest of the USCCB need to get real. If they can't summon the courage to send a disgrace like Mahony to the nearest monastery, then the Church's moral authority is nil. If Gomez or the USCCB appealed to Rome and were met with silence, that's an even bigger problem.

    Maybe as a protest, some of the faithful in LA could hoist up sackcloths and ashes wherever Mahony appears in public.

    ReplyDelete
  18. All Cardinals have universal faculties.

    ReplyDelete
  19. How exactly does the salvation of my soul "turn" on the work of Roger Mahony?

    ReplyDelete
  20. I live a mile from where Mahony is holed up. As for Archbishop Gomez, he's been utterly worthless. There's been no discernible change in this wasteland since he took over.

    ReplyDelete
  21. If I didn't know Mahony was a real person, I'd swear he was a character from a Jack Chick tract.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I would say Archbishop Gomez is afraid of Cardinal Mahony.

    The only potential problem is, that is the wrong person he should be afraid of. the Person to be Afraid of is Christ.

    meanwhile Since Cardinal Mahony is still an Ordained Bishop, in Union with the Holy Father, the celebrated Sacraments are valid. That is important.

    ReplyDelete
  23. What possible benefit for the church is there from ministry of Mahonys' like breed? Commissars like him deliver only misery and misfortune on others.

    ReplyDelete
  24. No need for idle speculation here. Archbishop Gomez is a man of God, trained under +Chaput, a man of God.

    There is an old saying: give a man just enough rope to hang himself. The more Mahony misbehaves, the tighter the noose gets.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Anonymous3:15 AM

    Maybe the good cardinal is invoking a state of emergency?

    ReplyDelete
  26. Why don't the faithful in Los Angeles take a stand and walk out of the Confirmation ceremony when Cardinal Mahoney shows up to administer the sacrament? As a parent, I would not want my child confirmed by this man, who failed so egregiously to protect the children in his diocese from molesting priests. Get up, grab your child's hand, and walk out of the church, thereby sending a very public message to Mahoney and Gomez, that it is not "business as usual" anymore in Los Angeles!

    ReplyDelete
  27. It's pretty much the same here in Milwaukee. When Dolan replaced the execrable Rembert Weakland, he allowed him to stay around making a nuisance of himself and very often delegated Confirmation duties to him. He had him at his installation ceremony as well.

    And the new Ordinary, Archbishop Listecki, is doing the same thing. Weakland was at his installation, is still around, still doing Confirmations, etc. We must presume that Weakland knows where all the bodies are buried.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Archbishop Gomez was installed in 2011. He had full access to the records, and protected them by the archdiocese spending enormous amounts of money, including unsuccessful appeals to the Supreme Court.

    When they finally came out, he threw Mahony under the buss to look good. He is deep into the coverup.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Share your thoughts with Cardinal Mahony on his blog - a number of concerned Catholics do....it's always helpful to charitably correct an erring brother and it leaves readers in no doubt about the catholicity of anything written by the good cardinal.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Floreat, Cardinal Mahony does not allow comments on his blog. But he does have twitter...and I've expressed my anger more than once.

    Archbishop Gomez was appointed co-adjutor in 2010. It would not surprise me if Cardinal Mahony was not in full disclosure about things in the Archdiocese...

    But who are we kidding, nothing will be done about this situation.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Archbishop Gomez has more important things on his agenda, for instance this man who lived his first 36 years in Mexico has come to the U.S. to tell us how important it is for us to give away our American citizenship to illegals because its 'nice'. I never knew that Catholic charity involved giving away other people's jobs, other people's money and a citizenship paid for with the blood of Americans (including the many Hispanic-Americans who have died in our wars) because... it is 'nice'.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Joe Pollitor

    Sorry - yes, you're correct. I meant his Twitter account...fast and immediate. Technological terminology isn't always my strong point, as you may have noticed. :-)

    ReplyDelete

Comment boxes are debate forums for readers and contributors of RORATE CÆLI.

Please, DO NOT assume that RORATE CÆLI contributors or moderators necessarily agree with or otherwise endorse any particular comment just because they let it stand.

_______
NOTES

(1) This is our living room, in a deeply Catholic house, and you are our guest. Please, behave accordingly. Any comment may be blocked or deleted, at any time, whenever we perceive anything that is not up to our standards, not conducive to a healthy conversation or a healthy Catholic environment, or simply not to our liking.

(2) By clicking on the "publish your comment" button, please remain aware that you are choosing to make your comment public - that is, the comment box is not to be used for private and confidential correspondence with contributors and moderators.

(3) Any name/ pseudonym/ denomination may be freely used simply by choosing the third option, "Name/URL" (the URL box may be left empty), when posting your comment - therefore, there is no reason whatsoever to simply post as "Anonymous", making debate unnecessarily harder to follow. Any comment signed simply as "Anonymous" will be blocked.

Thank you!