Roberto de Mattei
Corrispondenza Romana
June 12, 2019
"The bottom line is this: Pope Francis is deliberately concealing the McCarrick evidence."
The
extensive interview that Archbishop Maria Viganò gave to Chico Harlan and
Stefano Pitrelli in the Washington Post of June 10th is of
exceptional importance for several reasons.
The first
and most important reason is that this interview indicates the utter failure of
the Vatican’s strategy of ‘silence’,
faced with the detailed accusations of the former Nuncio to the United States. Those
in charge of the Vatican media were convinced that Monsignor Viganò’s
revelations would have been confined to a ‘niche audience’, ready to be
forgotten after some moments of emotional excitement. This did not happen..
The
Washington Post is one of the most widely read newspapers in the planet, with millions
of readers and the Archbishop’s interview was, for almost three days, the
second most popular article on its site.
Monsignor Viganò’s voice has had an impact world-wide, shattering the wall of
silence and imposing evidence that cannot be ignored or minimized.
The second
reason, connected to the first, is that with his interview, The Washington Post
recognizes Monsignor Viganò as a historical witness, whose credibility cannot
be placed in doubt by anyone. The
Archbishop does not enter into the theological problems arising from documents
like Amoris Laetitia, but limits himself to addressing the facts that he knows:
the existence of a “corrupt mafia” which “has
taken control of many institutions of the Church, from the top down, and is
exploiting the Church and the faithful for its own immoral purposes”. This
mafia “is bound together not by shared sexual intimacy but by a shared interest
in protecting and advancing one another professionally and in sabotaging every
effort to reform the sexual corruption”.
Regarding the clumsy efforts of the Vatican media to discredit him, by accusing
him of having ambitions of power: “In any case, my motivation is not the point,
and questions about it are a distraction. The truly important question is
whether my testimony is true. I stand by it, and I urge investigations so that
the facts may appear. Unfortunately, those who impugn my motives have been
unwilling to conduct open and thorough investigations”.



